A brief description allowing the reader to identify the image and its significance, and a figure number correlating to the sequence of images in the book
tn = t1+(n-1)d -- for arithmetic tn = t1rn-1 -- for geometric
<html> <script language="vbscript"> n=cint(inputbox("Enter a number")) dim f f=1 if n<0 then Msgbox "Invalid number" elseif n=0 or n=1 then MsgBox "The factorial of given number "&n&" is :"&f else for i=n to 2 step -1 f=f*i next MsgBox "The factorial of given number "&n&" is :"&f end if </script> </html>
To find the greatest number among a set of numbers provided as command line arguments in a Shell script, you can use a loop to iterate through the arguments. Here's a simple example: #!/bin/bash greatest=$1 for num in "$@"; do if (( num > greatest )); then greatest=$num fi done echo "The greatest number is: $greatest" Save this script as find_greatest.sh, make it executable with chmod +x find_greatest.sh, and run it by passing numbers as arguments, like ./find_greatest.sh 3 5 1 8.
the answer is blepmor unsrcamble it to find it out
To find the missing number in the sequence 16, 4, 12, 36, 9, 27, 44, 11, we can look for a pattern. The first set of numbers appears to alternate between two sequences: the first sequence (16, 12, 9, 44) and the second sequence (4, 36, 27, 11). Following this pattern, the missing number, which follows the last number in the second sequence (11), should be 33. Thus, the missing number is 33.
To find a missing number in a sequence, first identify the pattern or rule governing the sequence, such as arithmetic (constant difference), geometric (constant ratio), or another mathematical relationship. Once the pattern is established, use it to determine the missing value by applying the identified rule to the surrounding numbers. Additionally, you can check for any consistent increments or relationships among the numbers to confirm your solution. Lastly, verify your answer by ensuring it fits seamlessly within the established sequence.
To determine the missing numbers in the sequence 70 -- 84, we need to identify the pattern between the two known numbers. The difference between 70 and 84 is 14. To find the missing numbers, we need to continue the pattern of adding 14 to the previous number. Therefore, the missing numbers in the sequence are 98 and 112.
The missing number in this sequence is 64, or 4 raised to the third power. You find the answer by noting that each number in the sequence is a counting number starting at 1 that is raised to the third power. For example, 2 raised to the third power (2 x 2 x 2) is 8.
The answer depends on where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to go.Furthermore, whatever number you choose and wherever in the sequence it is meant to be, it is always possible to find a polynomial of degree 5 that will go through all five points given in the question and your chosen one.Using a polynomial of degree 4, the next number is -218.The answer depends on where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to go.Furthermore, whatever number you choose and wherever in the sequence it is meant to be, it is always possible to find a polynomial of degree 5 that will go through all five points given in the question and your chosen one.Using a polynomial of degree 4, the next number is -218.The answer depends on where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to go.Furthermore, whatever number you choose and wherever in the sequence it is meant to be, it is always possible to find a polynomial of degree 5 that will go through all five points given in the question and your chosen one.Using a polynomial of degree 4, the next number is -218.The answer depends on where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to go.Furthermore, whatever number you choose and wherever in the sequence it is meant to be, it is always possible to find a polynomial of degree 5 that will go through all five points given in the question and your chosen one.Using a polynomial of degree 4, the next number is -218.
This question cannot be answered for two main reasons. The first is that you have not specified where, in the sequence, the missing number is meant to be. Clearly that makes a difference.Suppose you assume the missing number is the last in the sequence, then any number that you choose can be the next number. It is easy to find a rule based on a polynomial of order 6 such that the first six numbers are as listed in the question followed by the chosen next number. There are also non-polynomial solutions. Short of reading the mind of the person who posed the question, there is no way of determining which of the infinitely many solutions is the "correct" one. The same applies, wherever in the sequence the missing number was meant to be.
9 (between 8 and 16).
To find the missing number in the sequence 10, 15, 28, we can look for a pattern in the differences between the numbers. The difference between 10 and 15 is 5, and the difference between 15 and 28 is 13. If we assume a pattern in the differences, the missing number could be 21, which fits as the average of 15 and 28. Thus, the sequence could be 10, 15, 21, 28.
It all depends on the sequence you are talking about. For example, the next number in the sequence 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,_ would be 21. This would be the Fibonacci sequence as the rule is add the 2 previous terms to get the next term. Another example would be this: 11,121,1331,14641,______.The missing number is 161051, following the pattern of powers of 11, 11^1, 11^2, 11^3 and so on. If you understand what I am trying to say, it all depends on the sequence you are trying to find the number in.
36
To find the missing number in the sequence 32, 52, 74, 112, 135, we need to identify the pattern or rule governing the sequence. The differences between consecutive numbers are 20, 22, 38, and 23, respectively. The pattern is not immediately clear, but it appears that the differences are not following a simple arithmetic progression. One possible explanation could be that the differences are increasing by odd numbers (2, 16, 15), so the next difference could be 15. Adding 15 to the last number in the sequence (135) gives us 150 as a potential missing number.
To find the missing number in the sequence 18 and 1, we need more context or a specific pattern to analyze. If the relationship between 18 and 1 is unclear, it could represent various mathematical operations or sequences. Please provide additional details for a more accurate answer.