Poor countries can benefit from a limited amount of scientific technology. They do not have the resources to utilize higher levels of technology, but they can benefit from things that improve the quality of food production, health care, and sanitation.
There are always openings for human trials.
Well for a start we could not do half the stuff we can do now if technology was not available and quality of life would be poorer
The meaning of an abnormal result varies with the clinical condition of the person tested.with multiple myeloma, a higher level means a poorer prognosis than a lower level.with kidney disease, an increased blood level means the problem is tubular.
Yes. Provided it is sustainably managed (many poorer countries can't to do this) Imagine a product built by solar power, made almost purely out of green house gases that produce fresh air in the process and provides a habitat for native animals and birds while being made. If someone invented we would celebrate. It is, of course, timber. Build a house out of it and lock up all that CO2 for centuries, while more CO2 is being capture by regrowing trees. If sustainable managed, forests are also valuable to people so they will more likely resist the land being cleared for mining or farming.
GMO's were generally created to prevents pests from coming infesting the plants. Another reason GMO's are created in order to make plants and animals more tougher, and more human friendly than other plants and animals
There are always openings for human trials.
More Developed countries are consumers as they have more technology so they can focus workers on services and buy from poorer countries less developed
economic growth rates tend to converge over time among different countries or regions. This phenomenon is based on the idea that poorer countries with lower initial levels of capital, technology, and productivity can grow faster than richer countries as they catch up.olicies can help promote convergence by facilitating the transfer of knowledge and technology from richer to poorer countries, fostering investment in human capital and infrastructure, and supporting market reforms that enhance productivity and competitiveness.
the development gap divides the richer (the richer north) and poorer (the poorer south) countries.
oxfam help poorer countries suffering from poverty or injustice
poorer countries might not get the help they need from the richer countries.
In poorer countries such as Bangladesh and some countries in Africa.
oxfam help poorer countries suffering from poverty or injustice
Slave Labour <3
Poor countries often lack access to resources, technology, education, and infrastructure needed for sustainable economic growth, while facing challenges such as corruption and political instability. On the other hand, rich countries often have established institutions, advanced technology, stable political systems, and access to global markets, allowing them to benefit from economies of scale and innovation. This creates a cycle where rich countries continue to accumulate wealth, while poor countries struggle to escape poverty due to systemic barriers.
No way why would they
because the infrastructure of buildings etc is not as good as in wealthier countries!