This is a very metaphorical assertion; man (or woman) is not literally a slave of technology. However, there is some poetic truth to the assertion. Most of our time and efforts are taken up with the operation, repair, or other handling of our various technological devices. With cell phones it has become more obvious than ever, although this was observed even back in the 1960's when there were no cell phones, but some people spent quite a lot of time watching television. Now people spend lots of time sending text messages, etc. I spend a lot of time answering questions on this web site. This does not exactly make me a slave to my computer, but still, I am awfully devoted to it.
slave
No, by definition technology is man-made. -ENGL 102-043 UW-Stout Students
fire
ya
to make searching easyer
slave
In the end, what separates a man from a slave? Money? Power? No, a man chooses, a slave obeys. A man chooses. A slave obeys.
yes man is a slave but not a master because man completely depends on it so machine has control over man
He was a free man - never a slave
Slave* APEX**
A slave
A slave
A slave
They had a seemingly endless supply of slave labor
No, the Tollund Man was not a slave. He was a naturally mummified body discovered in a peat bog in Denmark in 1950 and is believed to have been a sacrifice rather than a slave.
The man who bought Saint Patrick as a slave was named Milchu. It is believed that Milchu was a chieftain in Ireland.
free-man, free-woman