It could be argued that genetic research is neither good nor bad, it is the application of the research that may be good or bad. For example, a rich dictator creating a clone of himself - bad thing, a cure for Parkinson's disease - good thing.
genetic modification can be bad because animals and stuff are changed to taste better but im not sure if that is genetic engineering
good
new computers are googd
True!
Really, it just depends on what the purpose of the robot is.
It's not possible to tell from that information, because there's no connection. In fact, there may not be any such thing as "bad at engineering" at all, only "not sufficiently motivated to put in the effort to be good at engineering".
It depends how you take it, it is going through experiments to help human kind, if some one take for doing bad , that doesn't mean that Genetic engineering is bad or something else.
Genetic mutations can be good or bad, but evolution refers specifically to those mutations that make an organism better able to survive and to perpetuate their species, which makes them generally a good thing.
genetic modification can be bad because animals and stuff are changed to taste better but im not sure if that is genetic engineering
Benefit is good thing. Its good compared to bad.
A positive thing is good and a negative thing is bad .
what is the good thing anout polio? and what is the bad thing? what is the good thing anout polio? and what is the bad thing?
what is the good thing anout polio? and what is the bad thing? what is the good thing anout polio? and what is the bad thing?
good thing
It is a good thing.
it is a good thing and a bad thing
Its actually a good thing not a bad thing. thanks for the question I had funcaanswering that question.