0
It all depends on what you will be doing with Assembly Language. If your job or future employment plans include using Assembly Language, then yes, it is worth the effort. If it is required for a class or training for a job/employment, then yes, it is worth the effort. If Assembly Language is an interest for you, as in a hobby or spare time activity, then it is up to you to decide if it is worth your time to learn it.
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between assembly language program and high level language program?
There is very little difference, functionally, between assembly language and machine level language. Each assembly language statement corresponds to one machine instruction. The difference is in readability (who wants to read and write in hex code?) and in ease of address computation.
Why is c referred to as middle level language?
C is called a middle level language since it is a higher language than something like assembler, which communicates to the computer through operations that directly manipulate data and uses machine code.High level languages, are very close to human readable/speakable languages, such as English and French ( and many more), and are therefore more human-oriented.Unfortunately, the C programming language is neither a low-level language, such as assembler, or a high level language such as English, but somewhere in between. Thus a middle-level languageBy mistake. It is a high-level language.
On which machine was the first programming language developed?
The first programming language was machine code, the native language of the machine. Every machine type has its own version of machine code but we can trace the earliest example of machine code back to the days of the semi-automatic weaving loom invented by Basile Bouchon in 1725. Strictly-speaking, machine code is not a programming language. Programming languages are human languages, a means of producing machine code through symbolic abstractions that are much easier for humans to interpret than native machine code. It should also be noted that programming languages are never developed on a machine, the language is purely abstract and designed according to a specified proposals. The only thing that is actually developed on the machine is the implementation of the machine code program that physically converts the symbolic instruction code into the machine's own native machine code. Before we had any programming languages, all programs had to be written in the machine's own native machine code. Once we had one programming language, we could use it to create translators for other languages and indeed for other machines besides the one on which it executed. Note that it's difficult to know precisely when programming languages were first used because there were many language pioneers working simultaneously, often sharing ideas and evolving designs to the point that it is difficult to determine at what point a language is "fit for human consumption", so to speak. To make matters worse, many early programming languages were proposed but never designed, while others were designed but never implemented. Assembly language is the next step up from machine code. Like machine code, every machine type has its own version of assembly language, and is therefore a low-level language. Unlike machine code, code written in assembly language has to be translated into native machine code before it can be executed because machine code is the one and only language "understood" by the machine. Converting from assembly language to machine code is as tedious and as error prone as writing the machine code itself, however the actual conversion process is trivial enough that we can easily write a small machine code program (known as an assembler) to perform the conversion for us. The earliest known usage of an assembly language dates from 1949 on the EDSAC computer at Cambridge University, where the assembler (known as Initial Orders) was implemented in read-only memory. The inventors were Maurice Wilkes and W. Renwick. High-level languages are more abstract than assembly languages and are generally more portable (not machine dependent). The first high-level programming language was probably Autocode in 1952 on the Mark I computer at the University of Manchester, or Short Code in the same year on the UNIVAC 1. Short Code was based upon an earlier implementation known as Brief Code in 1949 for the BINAC computer, but it was never tested or debugged. Autocode used a compiler program to convert the high-level symbolic code into machine code whereas Short Code used an interpretation program. The difference between the two is that the native machine code produced by a compiler can be stored and executed without any further translation whereas code written in an interpreted language has to be converted by the interpreter program every time it is executed. As a result, compiled programs perform better than interpreted programs. Modern-day Java is an example of a programming language that is both compiled and interpreted. Unlike a traditional compiler, the Java compiler produces byte code which can then be interpreted to produce native machine code. The reason for this multi-conversion is that the same byte code can be executed upon any machine with a Java virtual machine implementation. That is, the byte code is the native language of the virtual machine and is much quicker to interpret than the higher-level source code would be. It also ensures that the intellectual property -- the source code itself -- is not revealed to the user. It is worth noting that Plankalkül was designed from 1943 to 1945 for the Z3 and therefore predates assembly language as well as Autocode and Short Code. However it was not actually implemented until 1998, more than 50 years after it was designed!
What is the advantage and disadvantage of assembly language?
Assembly language is a symbolic representation of a processor's native code. Using machine code allows the programmer to control precisely what the processor does. It offers a great deal of power to use all of the features of the processor. The resulting program is normally very fast and very compact. In small programs it is also very predictable. Timings, for example, can be calculated very precisely and program flow is easily controlled. It is often used for small, real time applications. However, the programmer needs to have a good understanding of the hardware being used. As programs become larger, assembly language get very cumbersome. Maintenance of assembly language is notoriously difficult, especially if another programmer is brought in to carry out modifications after the code has been written. Assembly langauge also has no support of an operating system, nor does it have any complex instructions. Storing and retrieving data is a simple task with high level languages; assembly needs the whole process to be programmed step by step. Mathmatical processes also have to be performed with binary addition and subtraction when using assembly which can get very complex. Finally, every processor has its own assembly language. Use a new processor and you need to learn a new language each time. Assembly is a great language to use for certain applications, rotten for others and never for the faint hearted.
Is visual basic a scripted language?
VBSCRIPT FILES: (.vbs) No, VBScript is an 'interpreted' language; where the code is both read/interpreted and translated into machine code line by line; this is a rather 'slow' method of doing things, though, when compared with using a 'compiled' language, instead. A compiled language, on the other hand; runs code much faster; because it translates the whole entire program into machine code *before* running it. Compiled languages are used to create stand alone executable (.exe) files with. VBScript does NOT create stand alone executable (.exe) files; instead, VBScript creates (.vbs) files; which rely on having an interpreter program to work. ==== CONCLUSION As you can see from my short descriptions above...which are by no means fully exhaustive; VBScript, is a rich, powerful, and, extremely diverse form of programming technology; which in my own humble opinion, is very well worth learning; as it gives you lots of control covering many different areas; and, especially so, if you are interested in working with Microsoft Windows based technologies.
Which one easier C plus plus or assembly language?
C++, but it's always worth learning both, if only to better understand the machine code you create with C++.
Is learning a foreign language worth time and effort?
Absolutely. Some may not be able to become fluent in a second language, but all can pick up enough to find it rewarding. To converse with someone of a different language and culture will really open a world of new possibilities in your own outlook of the world. English is after all, the world's number three language by the number of speakers. Mandarin and Spanish speakers make up 20 percent of the world's total population while only five percent speak English.
How do you replace the ignition switch assembly on a 1990 Chevy half ton truck?
If this has the locking tilt wheel it is better to find a salvage yard and get the entire steering assembly . Can get for around $100. Parts and time for replacing the Ignition assembly if you can do it at all will not be worth the effort.
Is there any assembly required with a Little Tikes Kitchen?
Some assembly is required for Little Tikes Kitchen. However, the effort required is not extraneous, and requires household tools, such as a screw driver. The reward in seeing your child have fun while playing with the sturdy result makes the small effort worth while.
What are some free language learning internet applications?
There are a number of free language learning applications, one that is worth mentioning is Bussu. With Bussu you can learn English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Turkish, Chinese, Japanese and Arabic.
Is it worth it to learn dutch?
Learning Dutch can be beneficial if you plan to work or study in the Netherlands or Belgium, or if you have a personal interest in Dutch culture and language. It can also open up opportunities for you to communicate with Dutch speakers in various contexts. Ultimately, whether it's worth it depends on your specific goals and interests.
How do you know if someone is worth the effort when your trying to get them to like you?
You will know yourself deep down if its worth the effort.
What is the value of learning French?
This is exactly the same as learning to cook. You can go on cooking your usual recipes or learn French or Creole ones and discover a whole new world. If you are not interested in, this is not worth trying. Learning another language is to enrich oneself.
Is English the only foreign language worth learning?
I agree with this idea that English is the only foreign language worth learning. First of all,English language is one of the most useful language in all the worlds. Furthermore,English language play an important role in our lives because without this,we can not speak with others strangers peoples . All in all,I am strongly in favour of English language .I believe this is one of the important things which characterise our lives.
What is language ego?
Language ego refers to a person's sense of self that is tied to their language or linguistic abilities. It affects how individuals perceive their own worth and intelligence based on their proficiency in a particular language. Language ego can impact communication, language learning, and social interactions.
What is a sentence for the word trivial?
Because Aaron wanted to save dollars, he believed that saving pennies was trivial.The amount of effort it takes to do your own homework is not trivial, but the amount of learning gained is worth it.
What is the sentence for the word trivial?
Because Aaron wanted to save dollars, he believed that saving pennies was trivial.The amount of effort it takes to do your own homework is not trivial, but the amount of learning gained is worth it.
