Silica itself is not considered a renewable resource because it is a mineral primarily derived from sand and quartz, which are finite and take millions of years to form. However, silica can be recycled from products like glass, which helps reduce the demand for new raw materials. While the recycling process can make its use more sustainable, the natural supply of silica is not renewable in the same way as resources like solar or wind energy.
No because, Like fossil fuels, silica (found in the world's sands and quartz) is a non-renewable, finite resource. However, silica is a far more plentiful resource.
no.
no
Fused silica is an engineering-quality, amorphous version of quartz. Source: http://www.makeitfrom.com/material-data/?for=Fused-Silica-Fused-Quartz
The turbines (mills) themselves are non-renewable but the wind the power source that is converted into useful work (usually electricity) is renewable.
No.
No because, Like fossil fuels, silica (found in the world's sands and quartz) is a non-renewable, finite resource. However, silica is a far more plentiful resource.
renewable
Non-renewable energy source means that the source will eventually run out and is not renewable.
Our primary source is still coal, and that is not renewable
no its a renewable source of energy
renewable source of energy can be regenerated but non-renewable source of energy can not be regenerated.
Renewable - unlimited source Non renewable - limited resource
Silica sand itself is considered renewable, as it is produced by the continual erosion of rocks and minerals. However, the rate at which it can be extracted and processed for industrial use may outpace its natural replenishment, leading to concerns about sustainability.
Yes it is a renewable source because it is growing again and again.
the answer for renewable is sources
yes, it is a renewable resources