Actually it does.
A nuclear power plant or nuclear power station.This consists of:a nuclear fission reactoran electric generation facilityone or more cooling towers to dispose of waste heat in the form of water vapora spent fuel rod storage pool of water (to keep the rods cool as their fission products decay)a manned control roometc.
Only plutonium! Is that any better?Actually all the transuranics can make suitable fuel for nuclear reactors, especially Americium. The Integral Fast Breeder(IFB) reactor was designed to reprocess Uranium and all the transuranics produced into fuel rods onsite, leaving only the short lived fission products as waste, which would only require storage for a couple centuries (not hundreds of thousands of years as current waste with the transuranics still in it does). Some of these fission products have industrial and/or medical uses and would be worth separating from the waste.
some:The plutonium and other transuranics can be recycled. They make excellent reactor fuel.The unburned uranium can be recycled.Many of the fission products could be separated for industrial and medical uses.
Nuclear waste can be divided into two types, high level, and low level. Low level nuclear waste is materials that have been exposed to nuclear materials, such as tritiated water, pieces of contaminated clothing, contaminated tools, materials that have been in the nuclear reactor or with the high level waste, earth that has had contaminated water soak into it, and so on. Some of these are stored at the plant, and others are shipped off to low level waste storage facilities. They are separated according to need. Some may need to be stored for a period of decades or centuries while the materials in them decays, and others may need to be stored for centuries. High level waste needs to cool off before anything can be done with it, so when it is removed from a reactor, it is put into a spent fuel pool where it is cooled with water while the short term isotopes in it decay to the point that they do not give off too much heat. This takes several years. At that point, the waste may be moved to what is called dry cask storage, where it is held until someone decides what to do with it on a more permanent basis. Some countries allow waste to be reprocessed and some do not. The United States does not, and since no one has figured out how to store waste over a long term, the waste accumulates at the plants that produced it. This is not a good solution because the plants are nearly all sitting on the shore or on river or lake banks, where they are exposed to some degree. The French have been very aggressive with reprocessing nuclear waste, and do it for a number of other countries. This is fine, except that the reprocessing has its own set of possibilities of disaster, the very reason the United States does not allow reprocessing. There are technologies being developed, such as energy amplifiers or accelerator driven systems, that may be able to use the nuclear waste as an energy source, reducing it to radiologically inert material in the process. We do not know if this will work.
fear of the waste.
nuclear fission results in the presence of used nuclear fuel that should be:either reprocessed (to gain back the remaining uranium and produced plutonium and to get the fission products as vitrified waste), orstored as high active waste; either under water or in dry storage casks.
Nuclear fusion does not create long-lasting radioactive waste like nuclear fission does. However, some materials used in fusion reactors may become radioactive and need to be handled carefully.
Nuclear Fission
fission crest radio active wastes wich are harmeful to life. they create tumors and we are running out of space to store the waste. fission crest radio active wastes wich are harmeful to life. they create tumors and we are running out of space to store the waste.
Two dangers associated with nuclear fission are the risk of nuclear accidents, such as the Chernobyl or Fukushima disasters, which can release radiation into the environment and pose health risks to people nearby. Another danger is the potential for proliferation of nuclear weapons if nuclear materials are not properly secured.
Yes, nuclear fusion produces some radioactive waste, but it is generally less than what is produced by nuclear fission.
No, fission is still a fuel in - waste out reaction. Eventually the supply of nuclear fuel would run out.
Nuclear Fission is the separation of two superheated nuclei of the same atom/ion. It creates a burst of energy which is used to spin turbines for nuclear energy. It is the opposite of nuclear fusion as that fuses the chemicals, this is the separation. So the answer: two atoms, some energy and a LOT of radioactive waste
Yes, fusion does not create long-lived radioactive waste like fission does.
The consequences of nuclear fission for the Earth include the potential for environmental contamination if radioactive materials are not properly contained, long-term storage challenges for radioactive waste, and the risk of accidents or meltdowns at nuclear power plants. Additionally, nuclear fission contributes to the proliferation of nuclear weapons, which poses a global security risk.
Nuclear fusion produces very little waste compared to nuclear fission. The waste produced by nuclear fusion is mainly low-level radioactive material, which is easier to manage and has a shorter lifespan.
Nuclear fission involves splitting heavy atoms like uranium, generating radioactive waste that needs careful disposal. This waste poses long-term environmental hazards due to its radioactivity and potential for leakage. On the other hand, nuclear fusion involves combining light atoms like hydrogen, producing minimal radioactive waste that does not have long-term environmental impacts.