Quality focuses on the software's conformance to explicit and implicit requirements. Reliability
focuses on the ability of software to function correctly as a function of time or some other quantity. Safety considers the risks associated with failure of a computer-based system that is controlled by software. In most cases an assessment of quality considers many factors that are qualitative in nature. Assessment of reliability and to some extent safety is more quantitative, relying on statistical models of past events that are coupled with software characteristics in an attempt to predict future operation of a program
If we discuss the different between these two forms of the signals that is; analog and digital then we should discuss it in different aspects such as working, their architectures, pros and cons as well. The major differences among the two signals are listed below
It doesn't discuss.
In the post-reading phase, I will summarize the main ideas and key points of the text to reinforce my understanding. I will also reflect on how the content relates to my existing knowledge and experiences, and consider any questions or insights that arise. Additionally, I may discuss the material with others or apply the concepts in practical contexts to deepen my comprehension.
Discuss the issues related to genetic mutations: sexual reproductions, migration and population size
eAch iNstrUctiOn mUst bE cleAr aNd aMbiguOus .
"Quality is conformance to customer expectations""Reliability is quality over time"
Comparing your lab data with a classmate's helps identify any discrepancies or errors in your measurements, promoting accuracy and reliability in your results. It fosters collaborative learning, allowing you to discuss methodologies and gain different perspectives on the experiment. Additionally, this practice can enhance understanding of the concepts involved and reinforce critical thinking skills as you analyze variations in data.
Comparing your lab data with that of your classmates is crucial for validating results and identifying potential errors. It helps to ensure consistency and reliability in the findings, as variations can indicate experimental errors or differences in methodology. Additionally, this collaborative approach fosters critical thinking and deeper understanding of the concepts being studied, while also providing opportunities to discuss and explore different perspectives on the data.
why don't you get on with the coursework question.
Discuss the different managerial styles of your superiors and which of these styles do you feel comfortable with and why?
discuss factors of production
1. Timeliness 2. Understandability 3. Reliability.4 Completeness. 5. Comparability. 6. Relevance
Great minds tend to have a deeper understanding of complex ideas and can discuss them in a more insightful and nuanced way compared to average minds. They are often able to make connections between different concepts and think critically about various perspectives, leading to more profound and engaging discussions.
Yes, I am familiar with physics concepts. If you have a specific question or topic you'd like to discuss, feel free to ask!
When discussing psychology, it is important to use evidence-based research and theories to support your points. Focus on key concepts such as behavior, cognition, emotions, and mental processes. Be open to different perspectives and interpretations to have a well-rounded discussion.
discuss the different day to day uses of statistics
discussed