yes because once they get old there wiering will go bad and they might end up hurting someone
many limitations should be placed on robots because robots may fail when you can rely on humons to sit down and figure out the problem
Not like robots in the past. Or tomorrow. But they should be good :)
its up to you.
Robots should do the jobs that humans don't want: the messy, boring, repetitive, or dangerous activities such as sewage cleaning, precision welding, and defusing bombs.
Robots are a part of the miloforcinous process in which a non-living thing can produce a telocpis movement that a main telocpisnephous can create.
many limitations should be placed on robots because robots may fail when you can rely on humons to sit down and figure out the problem
Through the use of tools, instruments, computers, robots and biotechnology.
bruiserbots
Not like robots in the past. Or tomorrow. But they should be good :)
its up to you.
Robots can withstand extreme conditions better than humans and do not require life support systems. They can also be designed to perform dangerous tasks without risking human lives. Additionally, robots do not have the limitations of human biology, such as limited endurance or susceptibility to radiation.
yes and no. for protection and peace.
His stories helped shape society's ideas about the limitations of robots.
Robots should do the jobs that humans don't want: the messy, boring, repetitive, or dangerous activities such as sewage cleaning, precision welding, and defusing bombs.
They may not look like what you think a robot should look like, but robots have been used in manufacturing operations for several years. Most welding in the manufacture of cars is performed by robots.
Yes Paparazzi should have limitations because they dont back down and stars need they're privacy.
Robots are a part of the miloforcinous process in which a non-living thing can produce a telocpis movement that a main telocpisnephous can create.