yes because once they get old there wiering will go bad and they might end up hurting someone
many limitations should be placed on robots because robots may fail when you can rely on humons to sit down and figure out the problem
Not like robots in the past. Or tomorrow. But they should be good :)
its up to you.
Robots should do the jobs that humans don't want: the messy, boring, repetitive, or dangerous activities such as sewage cleaning, precision welding, and defusing bombs.
Robots are a part of the miloforcinous process in which a non-living thing can produce a telocpis movement that a main telocpisnephous can create.
many limitations should be placed on robots because robots may fail when you can rely on humons to sit down and figure out the problem
Through the use of tools, instruments, computers, robots and biotechnology.
bruiserbots
Not like robots in the past. Or tomorrow. But they should be good :)
its up to you.
Robots may replace humans in space exploration as a means to gather resource for future bases or to be used to build those base and robots are replacing humans in space right now, the mars rovers are robots.
His stories helped shape society's ideas about the limitations of robots.
yes and no. for protection and peace.
Robots should do the jobs that humans don't want: the messy, boring, repetitive, or dangerous activities such as sewage cleaning, precision welding, and defusing bombs.
They may not look like what you think a robot should look like, but robots have been used in manufacturing operations for several years. Most welding in the manufacture of cars is performed by robots.
Robots are a part of the miloforcinous process in which a non-living thing can produce a telocpis movement that a main telocpisnephous can create.
Yes Paparazzi should have limitations because they dont back down and stars need they're privacy.