A common design used to confront the problem of causation is the randomized controlled trial (RCT). In an RCT, participants are randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group, which helps eliminate biases and confounding variables. This method allows researchers to establish a clearer causal relationship between an intervention and its effects by comparing outcomes between the two groups. By controlling for external factors, RCTs provide strong evidence for causal inferences.
hypothesis (WRONG) The problem must be clearly identified. (RIGHT A+)
I don't know how the scientific method compares to the design loop. That's why I'm asking you guys.
The scientific method is a systematic approach used to investigate natural phenomena, formulate hypotheses, conduct experiments, and draw conclusions based on empirical evidence. In contrast, the engineering design process focuses on identifying a problem, brainstorming solutions, creating prototypes, and iterating designs to develop functional products or systems. While both processes involve problem-solving and critical thinking, the scientific method emphasizes understanding and explaining phenomena, whereas the engineering design process prioritizes creating effective solutions to meet specific needs.
research design is the blue print showing the structure of the research process, while research method is the means of gathering evidences for a particular research design.
exploratory descriptive
Longitudinal
Causation can be addressed through various methods, such as experimental studies, observational studies, and modeling techniques. These methods aim to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between variables by controlling for confounding factors, utilizing randomization, or analyzing data through statistical approaches. It is important to choose the appropriate method based on the research question and available data.
hypothesis (WRONG) The problem must be clearly identified. (RIGHT A+)
Curt John Ducasse has written: 'Causation and the types of necessity' -- subject(s): Causation 'Truth, knowledge and causation' 'The method of knowledge in philosophy' -- subject(s): Knowledge, Theory of, Theory of Knowledge 'The philosophy of art' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Art, Aesthetics
when to use problem solving method
when to use problem solving method
A quasi-experimental design is a design that resembles and experimental design but does not have the key ingredient of random assignment. They involve selecting groups that are used to test a variable but with no random pre-selection process.
Identification of the problem Gathering needed information Searching for creative solutions Stepping from ideation to preliminary design Evaluation and selection of preferred solution Preparation of reports, plans, and specifications Implementation of the design
The design method is used in a variety of fields. The common thread is the steps used in the method. It includes situation, research, ideaton, development and realisation.
scientific method can be adopted to solve complex problem
I don't know how the scientific method compares to the design loop. That's why I'm asking you guys.
The scientific method is a systematic approach used to investigate natural phenomena, formulate hypotheses, conduct experiments, and draw conclusions based on empirical evidence. In contrast, the engineering design process focuses on identifying a problem, brainstorming solutions, creating prototypes, and iterating designs to develop functional products or systems. While both processes involve problem-solving and critical thinking, the scientific method emphasizes understanding and explaining phenomena, whereas the engineering design process prioritizes creating effective solutions to meet specific needs.