It would actually make no difference. The presence of the keywords during the declaration of the main method is important and not the order.
so a static public void main(String[] args) would just compile and run perfectly fine just like public static void main(String[] args)
There is no difference between public static void and static public void
You can write it in as many ways as you want. The words public, static and void can be interchanged during the method declaration and still the main() method will continue to work in the same way. i.e., public static void main(String[] args) is the same as static public void main(String[] args) However, if you miss either of these 3 keywords from the method signature, the compiler will still let you compile the method, but it just won't be the main method that can be used to start the program execution.
No. You can write it in as many ways as you want. The words public, static and void can be interchanged during the method declaration and still the main() method will continue to work in the same way. i.e., public static void main(String[] args) is the same as static public void main(String[] args) However, if you miss either of these 3 keywords from the method signature, the compiler will still let you compile the method, but it just won't be the main method that can be used to start the program execution.
public static void main
public class S{public static void main(String[]a){String o="public class S{public static void main(String[]a){String o=%c%s%c;System.out.printf(o,34,o,34);}}";System.out.printf(o,34,o,34);}}
The order of modifiers makes no difference; they mean exactly the same thing.
There is no difference between public static void and static public void
You can write. The order of these words does not make any difference.
You can write it in as many ways as you want. The words public, static and void can be interchanged during the method declaration and still the main() method will continue to work in the same way. i.e., public static void main(String[] args) is the same as static public void main(String[] args) However, if you miss either of these 3 keywords from the method signature, the compiler will still let you compile the method, but it just won't be the main method that can be used to start the program execution.
public class Hello{public static void main(String [] args){System.out.println("Hello");}}
No. You can write it in as many ways as you want. The words public, static and void can be interchanged during the method declaration and still the main() method will continue to work in the same way. i.e., public static void main(String[] args) is the same as static public void main(String[] args) However, if you miss either of these 3 keywords from the method signature, the compiler will still let you compile the method, but it just won't be the main method that can be used to start the program execution.
public static void main
public class S{public static void main(String[]a){String o="public class S{public static void main(String[]a){String o=%c%s%c;System.out.printf(o,34,o,34);}}";System.out.printf(o,34,o,34);}}
The main method can be declared as either of the below: public static void main(String[] args) or public static void main(String args[])
public class Main{ public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println("the factorial of 5 is: " + getFactorial(5)); } public static int getFactorial(int num){ return num + getFactorial(num-1); } }
public class RemoveSpace{ public static void main(String args[]){ String str = "8085"; Sysytem.out.println(str.trim()); } } Get The Desired OutPut....
if some method is static, then you can not call that method through the oobject of that class. but the name of the class. let us see a example: class Test { int a; int b; static void show() { System.out.println("we are in show"); } } class Main { public static void main(String args[]) { Test t=new Test(); t.show();\\thiss is an erroraneous code. because, the method "show()" is static. Test.show();\\this is correct } Arnas Sinha