1. High accuracy. Comparing to Basic Incremental algorithm (especially if the slope were > 1.) 2. High speed. Comparing to Digital Differenmtial algorithm. 3. Draws the line between any two points. Comparing to Basic Incremental algorithm which can't draw if x0 > x1 ( the format is: (x0, y0), (x1, y1). )
DDA uses float numbers and uses operators such as division and multiplication in its calculation. Bresgenham's algorithm uses ints and only uses addition and subtraction. Due to the use of only addition subtraction and bit shifting (multiplication and division use more resources and processor power) bresenhams algorithm is faster than DDA in producing the line. Im not sure, though if i remember right, they still produce the same line in the end. One note concerning efficiency: Fixed point DDA algorithms are generally superior to Bresenhams algorithm on modern computers. The reason is that Bresenhams algorithm uses a conditional branch in the loop, and this results in frequent branch mispredictions in the CPU. Fixed point DDA also has fewer instructions in the loop body (one bit shift, one increment and one addition to be exact. In addition to the loop instructions and the actual plotting). As CPU pipelines become deeper, mispredictions penalties will become more severe. Since DDA uses rounding off of the pixel position obtained by multiplication or division, causes an accumulation of error in the proceeding pixels whereas in Bresenhams line algorithm the new pixel is calculated with a small unit change in one direction and checking of nearest pixel with the decision variable satisfying the line equation.
These two algorithms are almost completely different. The only real similarity is that they are each designed to use only integer addition/subtraction and multiplication, avoiding expensive division and floating point operations.
What is the advantage of bresenham algorithm over dda algorithm?Read more: What_is_the_advantage_of_bresenham_algorithm_over_dda_algorithm
Speed and accuracy.
It can only be used on a rectangular clip window.
Bresenhams' algorithm is better
DDA uses float numbers and uses operators such as division and multiplication in its calculation. Bresgenham's algorithm uses ints and only uses addition and subtraction. Due to the use of only addition subtraction and bit shifting (multiplication and division use more resources and processor power) bresenhams algorithm is faster than DDA in producing the line. Im not sure, though if i remember right, they still produce the same line in the end. One note concerning efficiency: Fixed point DDA algorithms are generally superior to Bresenhams algorithm on modern computers. The reason is that Bresenhams algorithm uses a conditional branch in the loop, and this results in frequent branch mispredictions in the CPU. Fixed point DDA also has fewer instructions in the loop body (one bit shift, one increment and one addition to be exact. In addition to the loop instructions and the actual plotting). As CPU pipelines become deeper, mispredictions penalties will become more severe. Since DDA uses rounding off of the pixel position obtained by multiplication or division, causes an accumulation of error in the proceeding pixels whereas in Bresenhams line algorithm the new pixel is calculated with a small unit change in one direction and checking of nearest pixel with the decision variable satisfying the line equation.
AnswerDDA uses float numbers and uses operators such as division and multiplication in its calculation. Bresenhams algorithm uses ints and only uses addition and subtraction. Due to the use of only addition subtraction and bit shifting (multiplication and division use more resources and processor power) bresenhams algorithm is faster than DDA in producing the line. Im not sure, though if i remember right, they still produce the same line in the end.One note concerning efficiency: Fixed point DDA algorithms are generally superior to Bresenhams algorithm on modern computers. The reason is that Bresenhams algorithm uses a conditional branch in the loop, and this results in frequent branch mispredictions in the CPU. Fixed point DDA also has fewer instructions in the loop body (one bit shift, one increment and one addition to be exact. In addition to the loop instructions and the actual plotting). As CPU pipelines become deeper, mispredictions penalties will become more severe.Since DDA uses rounding off of the pixel position obtained by multiplication or division, causes an accumulation of error in the proceeding pixels whereas in Bresenhams line algorithm the new pixel is calculated with a small unit change in one direction and checking of nearest pixel with the decision variable satisfying the line equation.BUT this error can be calculated and will not cause problems for typical line drawing applications. Lines longer than what fits on a typical computer screen (a few thousand pixels) will be identical to Bresenham lines when using 32 bit integers. Fixed point DDA also has another advantage: Since it does not require conditional jumps, you can compute several lines in parallel with SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) techniques.
These two algorithms are almost completely different. The only real similarity is that they are each designed to use only integer addition/subtraction and multiplication, avoiding expensive division and floating point operations.
Do you mean "Why might a parallel line algorithm be needed?" or "What properties does a parallel line algorithm need to have?".
A algorithm in artificial intelligence is a line of code meant to simulate a human emotion.
I'll tell you when i look up the word algorithm
What is the advantage of bresenham algorithm over dda algorithm?Read more: What_is_the_advantage_of_bresenham_algorithm_over_dda_algorithm
Speed and accuracy.
It is a basic algorithm for generating lines on computer screen. line is generated between given 2 endpoints
DDA algorithm involves floating-point operations, while Bresenham algorithm uses only integer operations. DDA algorithm calculates the exact position of each pixel, while Bresenham algorithm determines the closest pixel to the ideal line path. DDA algorithm can suffer from precision issues due to floating-point calculations, while Bresenham algorithm is more accurate and efficient. DDA algorithm is simpler to implement but slower than Bresenham algorithm. DDA algorithm is susceptible to rounding errors, while Bresenham algorithm is not. DDA algorithm can produce jagged lines due to rounding errors, while Bresenham algorithm generates smoother lines. DDA algorithm is suitable for both lines and circles, while Bresenham algorithm is primarily used for drawing lines. DDA algorithm can handle lines with any slope, while Bresenham algorithm is more efficient for lines with slopes close to 0 or 1. DDA algorithm involves multiplication and division operations, while Bresenham algorithm uses addition and subtraction operations. DDA algorithm is a general line drawing algorithm, while Bresenham algorithm is specialized for line drawing and rasterization.
The main advantage of Bresenham's algorithm is speed. The disadvantage of such a simple algorithm is that it is meant for basic line drawing. The "advanced" topic of antialiasing isn't part of Bresenham's algorithm, so to draw smooth lines, you'd want to look into a different algorithm.