answersLogoWhite

0

Both are using Optimal substructure , that is if an optimal solution to the problem contains optimal solutions to the sub-problems

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Engineering
Related Questions

What is the difference between static and dynamic programming?

in static programming properties, methods and object have to be declared first, while in dynamic programming they can be created at runtime. This is usually due to the fact that the dynamic programming language is an interpreted language.


Difference between greedy algorithm and dynamic programming?

the basic difference between them is that in greedy algorithm only one decision sequence is ever generated. where as in dynamic programming many decision sequences are generated.


What is the difference between backtracking and dynamic programming?

The only difference between dynamic programming and back tracking is DP allows overlapping of sub problems. (fib(n) = fib(n-1)+ fib (n-2)).


What is dynamic programming?

Dynamic programming is a technique for solving problem and come up an algorithm. Dynamic programming divide the problem into subparts and then solve the subparts and use the solutions of the subparts to come to a solution.The main difference b/w dynamic programming and divide and conquer design technique is that the partial solutions are stored in dynamic programming but are not stored and used in divide and conquer technique.


Is quick sort is an example of dynamic programming algorithm?

quick sort is a divide and conquer method , it is not dynamic programming


What is difference between linear and dynamic programming?

Dynamic programming (DP) has been used to solve a wide range of optimizationproblemsWhen solving a problem using linear programming, specific inequalities involving the inputs are found and then an attempt is made to maximize (or minimize) some linear function of the inputs.


What has the author Ronald A Howard written?

Ronald A. Howard has written: 'Dynamic Probabilistic Systems, Volume II' 'Dynamic programming and Markov processes' -- subject(s): Dynamic programming, Markov processes


What has the author Sven Dano written?

Sven Danoe has written: 'Nonlinear and dynamic programming'


What are the key differences between memoization and dynamic programming, and how do they impact the efficiency and performance of algorithms?

Memoization and dynamic programming are both techniques used to optimize algorithms by storing and reusing previously computed results. The key difference lies in their approach: memoization is a top-down technique that stores results of subproblems to avoid redundant calculations, while dynamic programming is a bottom-up technique that iteratively solves subproblems and builds up to the final solution. Memoization can lead to improved efficiency by avoiding redundant calculations and reducing the time complexity of algorithms. However, it may require more memory to store results of subproblems. On the other hand, dynamic programming can also improve efficiency by breaking down a problem into smaller subproblems and solving them iteratively. It typically requires less memory compared to memoization but may have a slightly higher time complexity due to the iterative nature of solving subproblems. In summary, memoization and dynamic programming both aim to optimize algorithms by reusing computed results, but their approach and impact on efficiency and performance differ based on the specific problem and implementation.


What are the positives of dynamic programming?

There are several positives of dynamic programming. Dynamic programming allows a person to develop sub solutions for a large program. Having sub solutions makes it easier to maintain use of a program. Sub solutions also make it easier to debug a program.


What are the difference between greedy algorithm and dynamic programing?

A greedy algorithm is similar to a dynamic programming algorithm, but the difference is that solutions to the subproblems do not have to be known at each stage; instead a "greedy" choice can be made of what looks best for the moment.


How can one effectively implement dynamic programming in problem-solving techniques?

To effectively implement dynamic programming in problem-solving techniques, break down the problem into smaller subproblems, store the solutions to these subproblems in a table, and use these solutions to solve larger subproblems. This approach helps avoid redundant calculations and improves efficiency in finding optimal solutions.