with some of the very best Transformers about 7kva
with the ones made recently and costing 1/2 or 1/3 as much perhaps 25Kva
there are several losses in a transformer that prevent it from attaining 100% efficiency. One is core loss, which can be divided into Hysteresis losses, Eddy currents and Magnetostriction loses. see for more details http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer#Energy_losses
No load losses are real power losses (in watts, not vars), so I'm not sure what you're talking about. If you're trying to parallel a transformer with another one to try to cancel out no load losses, you can't do this. These losses are also called core losses and are the price you pay to energize a transformer.
Much to my dismay i found its an experimental value, depends on type of core, cooling tech, resistance of wiring etc.
copper loss is directly propostional to I (AMPERE) and iron loss directly propostional to V (VOLTAGE) then total losses is equal to volt ampere hence the rating of transformer in KVA. SULTAN
In 1600 kva transformer we provide NGR (Neutral grounding resistance)
there are several losses in a transformer that prevent it from attaining 100% efficiency. One is core loss, which can be divided into Hysteresis losses, Eddy currents and Magnetostriction loses. see for more details http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer#Energy_losses
You can tap off approximately 833 200 amp panels from a 250 kVA transformer. This calculation is based on dividing the kVA rating of the transformer by the current rating of the panel.
The result is that the transformer runs cool and contented. The '250 KVA' rating on the transformer is its maximum ability to transfer power from its input to its output without overheating, NOT an amount of power always running through it. If the 3 KVA load happens to be the only thing connected to the transformer at the time, then only 3 KVA flows into the transformer from the primary line, and only 3 KVA leaves the transformer secondary.
To calculate the amperage in the secondary side of a transformer, you can use the formula: Amps = kVA / (Volts x Sqrt(3)). For a 250 kVA transformer with a 220-volt secondary, the amperage will be approximately 660.4 Amps.
Transformers are rated in VA or kVA. That is because the voltage is limited by the power loss in the magnetic core, and the current is limited by the power loss in the resistance of the windings. The rated voltage times the rated current gives the transformer's rating in kVA.
No load losses are real power losses (in watts, not vars), so I'm not sure what you're talking about. If you're trying to parallel a transformer with another one to try to cancel out no load losses, you can't do this. These losses are also called core losses and are the price you pay to energize a transformer.
The 3 kVA transformer will weigh double the 1.5 kVA transformer.
The power factor is only taken into consideration when the Kilowatts of a transformer is used.
Much to my dismay i found its an experimental value, depends on type of core, cooling tech, resistance of wiring etc.
copper loss is directly propostional to I (AMPERE) and iron loss directly propostional to V (VOLTAGE) then total losses is equal to volt ampere hence the rating of transformer in KVA. SULTAN
Depends on the kva rating of the devices to be tested using a transformer.
In 1600 kva transformer we provide NGR (Neutral grounding resistance)