C is not an OOP language, period. However, while C++ supports OOP it does not rely on it. With C++, you can mix procedural, structured and object-oriented principals by mixing C++ code with C-style code and even raw assembly routines, neither of which are object-oriented.
The main features of OOP are the same regardless of the language. They are: encapsulation; data hiding; inheritance; and polymorphism.
C is a procedure oriented language ,Where C++ & java are object oriented language.But java is platform independent.So generally C is called POP.C++ is called OOP.But java is OOP , which is platform independent.If java does not support primitive data type then it is called as pure object oriented language.
C++ is only partially OOP because it is a superset of C and, for the sake of backward compatibility, retains the concept of primitive data types (such as integrals like char and int) and pointer data types, which are all strictly non-object-oriented. In Java and C#, there is no concept of a primitive data type. Even integral types such as int are treated as objects and there is no concept of a pointer data type.
There isn't one; C is strictly non object oriented. Although C++ is often considered to be an object-oriented extension for C (it was originally called C with Classes), it would be more accurate to describe them as siblings. The two have evolved separately and while they still retain a high-level of compatibility through their common ancestry, they are not the same language.
Any language that supports class types, private and protected data, inheritance, polymorphism, function overriding, virtual methods is regarded as an object oriented programming language. However, while C++ supports OOP, it does not rely on it. You can mix C++ and C-style code (non-OOP) in the same program.
C++ is based on C. C was not object oriented, therefore the language was not made to be object oriented and moreover C++ is not a "true OOP language". It is simply a non-OOP language with OOP functionality built onto it.
Class acts as an encapsulation of attributes and methods, that is used by an object oriented programming (OOP) language. Since C is not an OOP, its a structural programming language, one can not create classes in C. That is why OOP version of C was developed called C++, where one can work with classes.
C++ is not 100% OOP because it inherits from C (a non-OOP language) and therefore supports all primitive C types which are strictly non-object-oriented. C# and Java are 100% object oriented as all "primitives" are object-based.
It is called an OOP language because it supports the four pillars of the OOP paradigm: abstraction, encapsulation, inheritance and polymorphism. However, it is not 100% object oriented as it also supports the concept of primitive variables, including pointers, which are not implemented as objects.
The concepts of OOP in C++ are the same as for OOP in any other programming language: abstraction, encapsulation, inheritance and polymorphism.
The main features of OOP are the same regardless of the language. They are: encapsulation; data hiding; inheritance; and polymorphism.
C++ is an OOP language, so the question does not make sense. Please restate the question.
Primarily OOP support, but there are minor syntax difference. By and large anything you can do in C you can also do in C++.
C is a procedure oriented language ,Where C++ & java are object oriented language.But java is platform independent.So generally C is called POP.C++ is called OOP.But java is OOP , which is platform independent.If java does not support primitive data type then it is called as pure object oriented language.
C++ is only partially OOP because it is a superset of C and, for the sake of backward compatibility, retains the concept of primitive data types (such as integrals like char and int) and pointer data types, which are all strictly non-object-oriented. In Java and C#, there is no concept of a primitive data type. Even integral types such as int are treated as objects and there is no concept of a pointer data type.
The fundamental difference is that in C++ object-oriented programming (OOP) was added. C is a procedural language (that means. top-down structure design), where as C++, which is an extension of C itself, is an object oriented language.
Not sure what you mean by this. C is a not an object-oriented programming (OOP) language, and therefore has no constructor concept. You probably meant C++ but, even so, there is no "rise of constructor concept". Constructors are fundamental to OOP -- they allow you to initialise an object at the point of instantiation.