Mechanization is impractical on small farms due to several reasons. Firstly, the high cost of machinery and equipment can be prohibitive for small-scale farmers with limited financial resources. Secondly, the size and layout of small farms may not be conducive to large machinery, making it difficult to maneuver and operate efficiently. Additionally, the maintenance and repair of complex machinery may require specialized skills and resources that small farmers may not have access to.
Large scale mechanization is impractical on small plots because of such problems turning the equipment sound, getting from tiny plot to tiny plot. The head land is wasted as machines take considerable space to round that is impossible on the small plots.
Mechanization can be impractical for small farms due to the high initial investment costs and ongoing maintenance expenses associated with machinery, which may not be justified by the scale of production. Additionally, smaller farms often have diverse crop rotations and irregular field shapes that make the efficient use of large machinery challenging. Labor availability and the need for personalized farming techniques further complicate the adoption of mechanization in these settings. As a result, many small farmers may rely on traditional methods that are more suited to their specific needs and resources.
One significant effect of the mechanization of agriculture was the dramatic increase in crop production efficiency. With the introduction of machinery like tractors and harvesters, farmers could cultivate larger areas of land in less time, leading to higher yields. This shift not only reduced the labor requirements on farms but also contributed to the decline of rural labor opportunities and the consolidation of smaller farms into larger agricultural enterprises. Overall, mechanization transformed the agricultural landscape and contributed to the growth of the food supply chain.
Practical is the opposite of impractical
since impractical means not normal you could say: What he did was impractical. try that
Large scale mechanization is impractical on small plots because of such problems turning the equipment sound, getting from tiny plot to tiny plot. The head land is wasted as machines take considerable space to round that is impossible on the small plots.
Mechanization can be impractical for small farms due to the high initial investment costs and ongoing maintenance expenses associated with machinery, which may not be justified by the scale of production. Additionally, smaller farms often have diverse crop rotations and irregular field shapes that make the efficient use of large machinery challenging. Labor availability and the need for personalized farming techniques further complicate the adoption of mechanization in these settings. As a result, many small farmers may rely on traditional methods that are more suited to their specific needs and resources.
N. Kozyrev has written: 'Agricultural mechanization' 'Economic aspects of the mechanization of dairy farms'
Fewer farmers, bigger farms, more mechanization.
Clare Bishop-Sambrook has written: 'Contribution of farm power to smallholder livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa' -- subject(s): Agriculture and energy, Economic aspects, Economic aspects of Sustainable agriculture, Farm mechanization, Farms, Small, Poverty, Small Farms, Sustainable agriculture
Fewer farmers, bigger farms, more mechanization.
Advancements in agricultural technology and practices have increased the amount of food produced per acre, allowing fewer farms and farmers to produce more. Mechanization, improved seeds, and use of fertilizers and pesticides have all contributed to increasing productivity and reducing the need for as many small-scale farms and farmers.
Willis Oluoch-Kosura has written: 'An economic analysis of alternative methods of land preparation in Western Province, Kenya' -- subject(s): Agriculture, Corn, Economic aspects of Corn, Economic aspects of Farm mechanization, Economic aspects of Tillage, Farm mechanization, Kenya, Labor productivity, Machinery, Small Farms, Tillage
The spread of mechanization in the U.S. significantly increased farm productivity, allowing fewer workers to cultivate larger areas of land. As tractors and other machinery replaced manual labor, many small farms struggled to compete, leading to consolidation and the growth of larger agricultural operations. This trend contributed to a decline in the number of small farms while expanding the size of those that remained, ultimately transforming the landscape of American agriculture.
well they are grown in large corporate farms and for their own family in small family farms
One significant effect of the mechanization of agriculture was the dramatic increase in crop production efficiency. With the introduction of machinery like tractors and harvesters, farmers could cultivate larger areas of land in less time, leading to higher yields. This shift not only reduced the labor requirements on farms but also contributed to the decline of rural labor opportunities and the consolidation of smaller farms into larger agricultural enterprises. Overall, mechanization transformed the agricultural landscape and contributed to the growth of the food supply chain.
Collective farms were large, government controlled farms formed from small farms that were surrendered by force. These were common in socialist regimes.