Waterfall model tends to consume a lot more time compared to other software development models though it is able to pinpoint definite starting and ending points for a given project. This model assumes the requirements to remain static during the life of the project, so there is little or no chance of incorporating new changes to the software once work begins. If changes are tried to be incorporated it leads to more confusion and further delays. Its strong points lie in the fact that it is sequential, so there would be no confusion on the steps and the processes are straight down--no need to worry about so many conditions while working on a project. Additionally, this type of model tends to pack up on so much documentation. Therefore, such tends to be useful for future code revisions and reference. However, its drawbacks become apparent in the length of time a project will be developed and the cost it is able to consume.
Waterfall is one of the software development life cycle model. Waterfall model has five stages.
No, water fall model in software engineering is not a flexible model . Waterfall model have certain limitations like we can not go back into earlier phase .
The RAD model, also known as the Rapid Application Development, is a linear software for creating prototypes. The Waterfall model is a sequential software.
Iterative waterfall model is a software process model also called the incremental process model. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iterative_and_incremental_development
The waterfall development model is primarily used by large software companies. The incremental model is used by small companies and individuals.
All industries are using the waterfall model for software development.
The waterfall model is best suited for software development projects with well-defined requirements and a clear understanding of the end product. It is most effective when the project scope is stable and changes are minimal.
Waterfall is one of the software development life cycle model. Waterfall model has five stages.
Waterfall model
No, water fall model in software engineering is not a flexible model . Waterfall model have certain limitations like we can not go back into earlier phase .
Waterfall model is the best software life cycle model.
The RAD model, also known as the Rapid Application Development, is a linear software for creating prototypes. The Waterfall model is a sequential software.
Iterative waterfall model is a software process model also called the incremental process model. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iterative_and_incremental_development
It consists of different stages of software life cycle.
The testing phase consumes the maximum effort in waterfall model.
Advantage: - 1-You get the software according to your demand. 2-It is best for small projects. 3-It is very much sequential & systematic.
The waterfall model is a sequential software development process, in which progress is seen as flowing steadily downwards (like a waterfall) through the phases of Conception, Initiation, Analysis, Design (validation), Construction, Testing and maintenance. The unmodified "waterfall model". Progress flows from the top to the bottom, like a waterfall.It should be readily apparent that the waterfall development model has its origins in the manufacturing and construction industries; highly structured physical environments in which after-the-fact changes are prohibitively costly, if not impossible. Since no formal software development methodologies existed at the time, this hardware-oriented model was simply adapted for software development. Ironically, the use of the waterfall model for software development essentially ignores the 'soft' in 'software'. The first formal description of the waterfall model is often cited to be an article published in 1970 by Winston W. Royce (1929-1995), although Royce did not use the term "waterfall" in this article. Ironically, Royce was presenting this model as an example of a flawed, non-working model (Royce 1970). This is in fact the way the term has generally been used in writing about software development-as a way to criticize a commonly used software practice.