Theoretically a thread will give up its CPU time voluntarily by using the yield feature. But practically, the programmer will write the code and make the thread give up its CPU time. So it is not a voluntary act from the threads perspective. It is just doing it because the programmer made it do so.
No. If you want to start a new thread of execution, you need to call the start() method of the thread. Also, the run() is like any other java method and you can invoke it directly but if you do so, it would be called as part of the current programs thread and not as a new thread. When the start() method is invoked, the JVM creates a new thread and automatically calls the run() method and that is why a new thread gets started and not by calling run() directly.
I would say it impossible not to do it right!
A thread safe object is one that would be safe even if multiple thread instances are accessing it. For example if a single object is being updated by a thread and the same object is being read by another thread - we will end up with an inconsistency where the reading object is reading incorrect data because by the time it finishes reading, another thread would've updated it. So we use the keyword synchronized with methods to ensure that such a situation does not happen. An object that wont let two threads access it simultaneously is called a thread safe object
You would call a person who does shoe repair a cobbler.
A .75-10 Unified National Coarse thread (3/4-10 UNC) has 10 threads per inch. The lead would be 1/10 of an inch.
Calling Threads.....
No. If you want to start a new thread of execution, you need to call the start() method of the thread. Also, the run() is like any other java method and you can invoke it directly but if you do so, it would be called as part of the current programs thread and not as a new thread. When the start() method is invoked, the JVM creates a new thread and automatically calls the run() method and that is why a new thread gets started and not by calling run() directly.
The past tense of "thread" would be "threaded".
I would, but it depends on how strong the fabric and the thread are.
a silk thread would be perfect or an ordinary cotton will do
From the limited context; i would say that in this example, 'thread' means a small portion or part of. Thread of this belief would be synonymous with the smallest bit of this belief, for example.
Metric thread pitch is measured directly from crest to crest of the thread form. For example the distance from crest to crest of a M8 x 1.25 MM thread would be 1.25 MM. Another way to measure it would be linear travel per rotation, in which case a M8 x 1.25 MM thread would travel 1.25 MM each rotation.
Hand sewing is done by using a needle with thread, and joining two fabrics with the thread. Generally, for hand sewing, you would choose a thread size based on what you're sewing. The higher the wt number, the lighter (or finer) the thread is.
No. If the wife is also on the deed to the premises she would need to voluntarily transfer her interest to her husband by executing a quitclaim deed.No. If the wife is also on the deed to the premises she would need to voluntarily transfer her interest to her husband by executing a quitclaim deed.No. If the wife is also on the deed to the premises she would need to voluntarily transfer her interest to her husband by executing a quitclaim deed.No. If the wife is also on the deed to the premises she would need to voluntarily transfer her interest to her husband by executing a quitclaim deed.
I would use thick thread.
I would imagine this would depend on where you are calling. I would recommend SpeedyPin.com, an online calling card retailer that seems to accomodate calling cards to most countries. They conveniently list their rates on their main page.
Poke or thread. Since you ride a bicycle, you would thread or poke a needle.