Use of the ampersand (&) in writing is a spelling mistake. Not acceptable unless you're trying to be funny.
No. This is a case where the subjunctive still lives! Use "be" instead of "is."
It sounds fine but even if you put "or" in it, it still works out fine
"Champing" is the original form -- it is still currently endorsed as the only correct form by the Associated Press and others; "chomping" may be considered "correct" now because of its over-misuse. Just like "ain't" is now in the dictionary -- just because it's been adopted on account of frequent use/misuse -- doesn't necessarily vouch for its correctness. If you say "chomping" to more learned communities or members of the media, be prepared for some criticism. While you're are it, better throw in "between you and I" just to seal the deal. (Please note: that's called "sarcasm"; the correct form is "between you and me.")AnswerChamping is the correct usage, although through active mis-use chomping is now considered an alternative in some circles the way ain't is considered an alternative... FWIW, some actual misuses to avoid:"flaunt" instead of flout, meaning to ignore."hone in on" instead of home in on."for all intensive purposes" instead of intents and purposes"carmel" instead of caramel"less" problems instead of fewer problems (if you're discussing quantities; the term is "fewer"; if it's volume, "less" is correct.)"towards" instead of toward"doggy-dog" instead of dog-eat-dog"run the gauntlet" rather than the correct "run the gantlet" (a gauntlet is a glove; a gantlet is an ordeal, and refers to the partition and ordeal between joust opponents)"try and" rather than the correct "try to" (test this by applying the past tense: 'I tried to succeed but failed' as opposed to 'I tried and succeeded but failed')"ex-ce-tra" rather than the correct "et-cet-er-a" (should be 4 syllables; no "x")"ve-tran" rather than the correct "vet-er-an" (should be 3 syllables)"ve-tra-nar-i-an" rather than the correct "vet-er-i-nar-i-an" (should be 6 syllables)"in-trest" rather than the correct "in-ter-est" (should be 3 syllables)"youngest of the two" rather than the correct "younger of the two" (younger refers to two, youngest references 3 or more)Other popular mistakes are:"larnyx" rather than the correct "larynx" (note the y is before the n)"it's" or "its" improperly used... "it's" is a contraction of "it is", "its" refers to possessiveness.
Thank you for your quick reply
Certainly. The sentence has a subject, a verb, and an object modified by an adjective. It would still be correct grammatically if it ran " You drank an imaginary bus." Remember that "grammatically correct" and "meaningful" are not the same.
"I said to him" is a grammatically correct sentence fragment since "said" is still waiting for its direct object. You said what to him? "I said "to him". would be a grammatically correct sentence.
No. This is a case where the subjunctive still lives! Use "be" instead of "is."
Yes. Its use of the subjunctive "have" instead of the declarative "has" is correct. 'Tis a bit old-fashioned, though.
"Nip it in the butt" instead of the correct "Nip it in the bud" (think nipping off a plant bud to stop it from growing)."I could care less" (meaning you do care some) instead of "I couldn't care less" (meaning you don't care at all)."One in the same" (it's not inside the same) instead of the correct "One and the same.""You've got another thing coming"(which makes no sense if you're talking about thinking) instead of the correct "You've got another think coming" (as in "If you think that, you've got another think coming.")"On accident" instead of the correct "By accident.""Statue of limitations" instead of the correct "Statuteof limitations" (it's not carved of marble)."For all intensive purposes" instead of the correct "For all intents and purposes" (meaning you intend to do something and have a purpose)."To extract revenge" (meaning take it out of something) instead of the correct "To exact revenge" (to give it out)."Old timer's disease" instead of the correct "Alzheimer's disease" (it's named for a scientist)."Giving you leadway" (not actually a word) instead of the correct "Giving you leeway" (leeway is room to maneuver)."I'll axe him that question" (you're chopping him with an axe?) instead of the correct "I'll ask him the question.""Scotch free" instead of the correct "Scot free.""I turned in a 360 degree angle" (you turned all the way around and are still headed in the same direction) instead of the correct "I did a complete 180 degree turn" (meaning you turned around and went in the opposite direction)."Curl up in a feeble position" (means weak) instead of the correct "Curl up in the fetal position" (like a baby)."Hone in on the answer" (means to sharpen something) instead of the correct "Home in on the answer" (means to locate the correct spot).
Yes, but it is still wrong. Grammatically correct is not the same as meaningful. Assuming you mean "yield for all time," use "give up for ever" instead of "...for never."
it is not correct English, you rather say still
The yahoo finance symbol is XAUUSD=X. I am still trying to find a symbol for MSN Money.
Yes. It is correct. However, the word ' kindly ' is unnecessary. But you can still use it. & instead of saying Clarification ( alliteration with Contact ; Letter ' C ' ) you could say ' if you have any questions ' Or, ' questions, suggestions or feedback. '
The second one is correct: "If the opportunity still exists."
r u still on
Tungsten. Its symbol, however, is still W.
Thallium is a chemical element with symbol Tl and atomic number 81