answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the major difference between generalizations and oversimplifications when making historical claims?

The major difference between generalizations and oversimplifications in historical claims lies in their accuracy and nuance. Generalizations can effectively summarize broader trends or patterns based on evidence, while still allowing for exceptions and complexities. In contrast, oversimplifications reduce complex historical events or contexts to overly simplistic statements, often ignoring important details and nuances, which can lead to misleading conclusions. Thus, generalizations maintain a level of validity, whereas oversimplifications can distort understanding.


Why did Jesus go to India?

There is no historical evidence that that ever happened, other than through His followers. It's as unsupported as saying Jesus manifested Himself to the Americas to start mormonism.


What is an unsupported inference?

An unsubstantiated opinion is an opinion without evidence, facts, or proof.


What type of reasoning involves us many specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations?

inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.


What type of reasoning involve using many specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations?

inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.


What type of reasoning involves using many specific pieces of evidence make generalizations?

inductive reasoningThe type of reasoning that involves using specific pieces of evidence to make generalizations are called inductive reasons.


What is a good habit to cultivate when making generalizations?

Providing evidence to support the generalization


What does Contemporary evidence mean?

Contemporary evidence refers to information or data that is created or collected during the same time period as the events or phenomena being studied. It includes materials such as documents, recordings, and firsthand accounts that provide insights into current societal, cultural, or historical contexts. This type of evidence is crucial for understanding the perspectives and conditions of a particular era, as it reflects the realities of that time.


What sources of historical evidence would most help the historian form a historical argument to answer this question?

Primary sources such as written records, letters, official documents, and artifacts from the time period in question would be crucial for a historian to form a strong historical argument. Additionally, archaeological remains, oral histories, and other contemporary accounts would provide valuable evidence to support the argument. Comparing and analyzing different types of evidence can help to create a well-rounded and robust historical interpretation.


What is the definition of unsupported hypothesis?

An unsupported hypothesis is a statement that proposes a possible explanation for something but lacks evidence or data to back it up. It is typically not based on any empirical research or logical reasoning, making it unreliable and unproven.


How can one avoid making hasty generalizations?

To avoid making hasty generalizations, one should gather sufficient evidence, consider different perspectives, and critically evaluate information before drawing conclusions.


What is contemporary evidence?

Evidence that existed or occured within the selected time frame you're looking at.