There's is a contraction of "there is" and requires an apostrophe.
"Theres" isn't actually a word. "There's" is a word, and is a contraction of "There is". "Theres" must have an apostrophe to mean anything at all in the English language.
The sentence "The cat chased its tail" needs an apostrophe added to be correct if intended to show possession, as in "The cat chased it's tail," which implies "it is." However, the correct form should actually be "its" without an apostrophe to indicate possession. Therefore, the sentence actually doesn't require an apostrophe for correct possessive use.
The word intentions is a common plural noun. It requires no apostrophe.She had the best intentions.My intentions were made clear.If the word intentions has a possession or belonging, it needs an apostrophe. But I cannot think of an instance when "intentions" could own or possess anything! It would be the noun preceding intentions that needs the apostrophe.
If the "s" isn't part of the name and you're trying to show that Charlotte is possessing something, then yes, it needs an apostrophe. Charlotte's new dress, for example.
If you are talking about the group of years from 1890 to 1890, then it is 1890s, so no apostrophe is needed. If you are talking about something relating to the year 1890, then it is a possessive and it needs the apostrophe: "What was 1890's most significant historic event?"
"Theres" isn't actually a word. "There's" is a word, and is a contraction of "There is". "Theres" must have an apostrophe to mean anything at all in the English language.
Mikes needs an apostrophe. So the sentence would be: "Mike's car needs a new muffler and new brakes."
Yes.If the "needs" refers to one student then it is -> student's needsIf the "needs" refers to many students then it is -> students' needs
The sentence "The cat chased its tail" needs an apostrophe added to be correct if intended to show possession, as in "The cat chased it's tail," which implies "it is." However, the correct form should actually be "its" without an apostrophe to indicate possession. Therefore, the sentence actually doesn't require an apostrophe for correct possessive use.
The word intentions is a common plural noun. It requires no apostrophe.She had the best intentions.My intentions were made clear.If the word intentions has a possession or belonging, it needs an apostrophe. But I cannot think of an instance when "intentions" could own or possess anything! It would be the noun preceding intentions that needs the apostrophe.
If the "s" isn't part of the name and you're trying to show that Charlotte is possessing something, then yes, it needs an apostrophe. Charlotte's new dress, for example.
If you are talking about the group of years from 1890 to 1890, then it is 1890s, so no apostrophe is needed. If you are talking about something relating to the year 1890, then it is a possessive and it needs the apostrophe: "What was 1890's most significant historic event?"
Yes. The "m" in Mcpherson needs to be capitalized as well.
theres only two. 1. When something belongs to someone. Those are LUCY'S boots. 2. When the apostrophe takes place of a word.
Roses' with an apostrophe is plural possessive. Roses is just the plural. Plurals, when written correctly, do not have an apostrophe. Adding an apostrophe makes the plural possessive.An example of roses' is use would be The roses' water in the vase needs to be topped up.
Audra's Sweets. The sweets belong to Audra, so she needs the apostrophe. There's more than one sweet, so it gets the "s" but no apostrophe.
A plural possessive noun is a noun that has an apostrophe after the word. This is mainly uses when the word ens in the letter S or when theres two or more things being stated.