0
How are krashen and vygotsky similar in their preparation of second languagae acquisition?
. How are Krashen
and Vygotsky
similar in their perceptions on SLA?
Answer:
Krashen's
input hypothesis resembles Vygotsky's
concept of zone of proximal development. According to the input hypothesis, language acquisition takes place during human interaction in an environment of the foreign language when the learner receives language 'input' that is one step beyond his/her current stage of linguistic competence. For example, if a learner is at a stage 'i', then maximum acquisition takes place when he/she is exposed to 'Comprehensible Input' that belongs to level 'i + 1'.Vygotsky sees the Zone of Proximal Development as the area where the most sensitive instruction or guidance should be given - allowing the child to develop skills they will then use on their own - developing higher mental functions. Vygotsky
also views interaction with peers as an effective way of developing skills and strategies. He suggests that teachers use cooperative learning exercises where less competent children develop with help from more skillful peers - within the zone of proximal development.
Vygotsky
speaks of internalization of language while Krashen
uses the term language acquisition; both are based on a common assumption: interaction with other people. The concept of acquisition as defined by Krashen
and its importance in achieving proficiency in foreign languages; is a perfect application of Vygotsky's
view of cognitive development as taking place in the matrix of the person's social history and being a result of it.
The distinct concepts in Krashen's
acquisition theory and Vygotsky's
sociocultural theory are complementary in providing resources for language teaching methodology.
By explaining human language development and cognitive development, Vygotsky's
social-interactionist
theory serves as a strong foundation for the modern trends in applied linguistics. It lends support to less structured and more natural, communicative and experiential
What else can I help you with?
How are vygotsky and krashen similar?
Vygotsky and Krashen both emphasize the importance of social interaction in the learning process. Vygotsky's sociocultural theory highlights how social context and collaborative learning contribute to cognitive development, while Krashen's Input Hypothesis suggests that language acquisition occurs most effectively when learners are exposed to comprehensible input in a social setting. Both theorists advocate for the idea that learning is not solely an individual endeavor but is significantly influenced by social interactions and cultural context.
What is krashen model?
The Krashen model, also known as the Monitor Model, is a theory of second language acquisition that emphasizes the importance of input, or exposure to language, in learning a new language. It suggests that language acquisition occurs through a natural process that is similar to the way children acquire their first language. Krashen's model includes hypotheses such as the input hypothesis, the affective filter hypothesis, and the natural order hypothesis.
What is Krashen's Monitor hypothesis?
Krashen's Monitor hypothesis states that there is a relationship between language acquisition and language learning. It suggests that learned language knowledge acts as a monitor that checks and corrects language output when learners have time and focus to do so, but that it does not play a significant role in actual language acquisition.
How do you pronounce the word krashen?
krashen
What is the population of Krashen?
Krashen's population is 294.
Is Krashen a Humanic theorist?
Stephen Krashen is primarily known as a second language acquisition theorist rather than specifically a humanistic theorist. His work emphasizes the importance of input and affective factors in language learning, which align with some humanistic principles, such as the role of emotional and social contexts. However, his theories, particularly the Input Hypothesis and the Affective Filter Hypothesis, focus more on cognitive processes related to language acquisition than on humanistic education as a whole. Thus, while there are overlaps, Krashen is not exclusively classified as a humanistic theorist.
When was Stephen Krashen born?
Stephen Krashen was born in 1941.
What is Krashen's affective filter hypothesis?
Krashen argues that our negative emotions can get in the way of learning. In essence, if we are stressed out, or have other emotions that get in between us and the lessons, then we are less able to learn.
What was Lev Vygotsky best known for?
Vygotsky is best known for is theory of language acquisition, particularly the idea of scaffolding and the zone of proximal development. The scaffolding theory is that you help support learning until eventually the student doesn't need help and so the 'scaffolding' can be taken away, as the student has learned what was required. The zone of proximal development is much the same as Steve Krashen's idea of i+1; you give students input which is a little above their level and challenging, as there is no point in only giving them knowledge at the level they are at.
How do you apply krashen's five hypotheses in your teaching?
To apply Krashen's five hypotheses in teaching, incorporate comprehensible input by using a variety of activities and resources at the students' current language level. Encourage students to focus on meaning over form to promote natural acquisition. Create a supportive environment where students feel comfortable taking risks with the language. Emphasize the importance of reading and exposure to different types of texts to develop language proficiency. Encourage students to establish a positive attitude towards language learning and provide opportunities for meaningful communication.
What are the implications of monitor hypothesis?
The Monitor Hypothesis, proposed by Stephen Krashen, suggests that conscious language knowledge (grammar rules) can only act as a monitor or editor for language production, rather than directly facilitating language acquisition. This means that while explicit knowledge can help refine and correct language use, it does not contribute to the natural acquisition process that occurs through meaningful communication. The implications include a focus on immersive, contextual learning rather than rote memorization of grammar, emphasizing the importance of exposure to authentic language use in developing fluency. Consequently, educators may prioritize communicative methods over traditional grammar instruction to enhance language learning outcomes.
Where can you find articles on the theories of second-language learning?
You can start with the Wikipedia article on second language learning, appearing in the related links. Go from the article to its bibliography part, containing several articles. You can also start with Stephen Krashen's papers, also appearing in the related links.
