Was and were.
ability is the noun form of the adjective able;conversation is the noun form of the verb to converse;dependence is the noun form of the verb to depend;departure is the noun form of the verb to depart;dwelling is the noun form of the verb to dwell;favorite is the noun form of the verb to favor;happiness is the noun form of the adjective happy;information is the noun form of the verb to inform;rarity is the noun form of the adjective rare;weakness is the noun form of the adjective weak;writer is the noun form of the verb to write;writing is also a noun form of the verb to write.
No, it is a verb form, the past participle of 'to write.'
No. The word to is a grammatical particle. It is used BESIDE a verb to form an infinitive, which a compound form of verb. For example: to see, to sleep, to go, to write, and so on. But the word to per se is not a verb.
The word 'writing' is a gerund, the present participle of a verb (the -ing form) 'to write' that functions as a nounin a sentence.The present participle of a verb also functions as an adjective.Examples:Your writing could be improved. (noun, subject of the sentence)The teacher was writing questions on the board. (verb)This was my grandfather's writing desk. (adjective)
A noun form for the verb to write is writer, one who writes, or the verbal noun (gerund) writing.
"Was writing" is a helping verb (to be) and an action verb (to write). The words "was writing" functions as a verb in a sentence.
ability is the noun form of the adjective able;conversation is the noun form of the verb to converse;dependence is the noun form of the verb to depend;departure is the noun form of the verb to depart;dwelling is the noun form of the verb to dwell;favorite is the noun form of the verb to favor;happiness is the noun form of the adjective happy;information is the noun form of the verb to inform;rarity is the noun form of the adjective rare;weakness is the noun form of the adjective weak;writer is the noun form of the verb to write;writing is also a noun form of the verb to write.
The future perfect tense of the verb to write is will have written.
No, it is a verb form, the past participle of 'to write.'
The verb in the sentence is "written," which is the past participle form of the verb "write."
No. The word to is a grammatical particle. It is used BESIDE a verb to form an infinitive, which a compound form of verb. For example: to see, to sleep, to go, to write, and so on. But the word to per se is not a verb.
The word 'writing' is a gerund, the present participle of a verb (the -ing form) 'to write' that functions as a nounin a sentence.The present participle of a verb also functions as an adjective.Examples:Your writing could be improved. (noun, subject of the sentence)The teacher was writing questions on the board. (verb)This was my grandfather's writing desk. (adjective)
"Write" is a verb and therefore is the same applied to singular and plural, for example:"I write the music." and "They write the music."
The past tense of "cry" is "cried."
The correct form is "does it imply", as "imply" is the base form of the verb and is used with the auxiliary verb "does" in interrogative sentences.
Yes. Written is the past participle of "to write."write / wrote / written.They write every day.They wrote yesterday.They have written every day.Write is an irregular verb because the past is not formed by adding -ed to the verb.regular verb - walk / walked, slice / sliced, talk / talkedirregular verb - write / wrote, eat / ate, run / ran, swim / swam
The past tense of "run" is "ran."