0
What else can I help you with?
A secondary source is most likely reliable and credible if it is?
C. is not influenced by a bias.
What makes a source credible?
its accuracy can be corroborated
You know a source is not credible if it?
Not true
What is the definition of credible?
"Credible" is defined as "Being believable, based on information, source or fact." - Something that is credible, is reliable, it's trustworthy.
A source that is written or created by a person who experienced an event personally is called a?
Primary Source - Apex Learning
What factors contribute to making a source not credible?
Several factors can contribute to making a source not credible, including lack of expertise or authority on the topic, bias or agenda, lack of evidence or sources to support claims, and inconsistency with established facts or reputable sources.
A credible source will have?
must be reliable and written by professionals.
What information would suggest that this source is likely reliable and credible?
A reliable and credible source would typically be written by an expert in the field, cite reputable sources, and be published by a respected publication or institution. Additionally, the information presented should be supported by evidence and not show any bias or agenda.
Which is an indication that a source is probably not credible the source is a personal website the source is unbiased the source is published in a reputable magazine the source includes the author and?
A source being a personal website is likely not credible because it may lack peer review or editorial oversight. Bias may also indicate lack of credibility. Sources published in reputable magazines and those with named authors are generally more reliable.
When researching a topic why must you be on guard against bias?
Being on guard against bias is crucial when researching a topic because bias can lead to inaccurate or skewed information. It can influence the way information is presented, interpreted, and analyzed, which can affect the overall reliability of the research. By recognizing and minimizing bias, you can ensure that your research is objective and credible.
A secondary source is most likely reliable and credible if it is?
C. is not influenced by a bias.
When looking at a webpage what question should you ask yourself about the source?
who created this page
What makes a once credible witness not credible?
A once credible witness may become not credible if they are found to have a bias or personal interest in the outcome of the case, if their testimony is inconsistent or contradicted by other evidence, or if they have a history of providing false information or being unreliable in the past. Additionally, factors such as emotional state, memory issues, or manipulation can also affect a witness's credibility.
How do you Define a credible source?
A credible source is one that provides reliable, accurate, and well-researched information, typically supported by evidence and expert consensus. It is often published by reputable organizations, academic institutions, or experts in the relevant field. Additionally, credible sources are transparent about their methodology, cite their references, and are free from bias or conflicts of interest. Evaluating the author's qualifications and the publication's reputation is also essential in determining credibility.
What makes a source credible?
its accuracy can be corroborated
What does a historian ask himself to decide if a primary source is usable or not for his research?
A historian may ask themselves the following questions to determine if a primary source is usable: Is the source contemporary to the events being studied? Is the author credible and knowledgeable about the subject matter? Is there bias or perspective that needs to be considered when interpreting the source?
How does your own bias influence your view of a newws source's validity?
My own bias can significantly shape how I perceive the validity of a news source. If I align with the political or social viewpoints presented, I may be more inclined to trust and accept the information as credible. Conversely, if the source contradicts my beliefs, I might scrutinize its reliability more harshly or dismiss it outright. This inherent bias can lead to a selective interpretation of information, reinforcing my pre-existing views rather than allowing for an objective assessment.
