Yes, participate is the correct spelling.Some example sentences are:I would like to participate in the class.Those who participate will be rewarded.
Endanger is the correct spelling.Some example sentences for the word are:His behaviour would endanger the public.Too much human agriculture will endanger many species of animals.
The phrase would be written, "That's yours".
This would usually be correct, as in, "Several deaf people in the audience praised your signing during the lecture", or "Your signing a check is required for a bank where you have a checking account to honor the check when presented." "Signing" in these sentences is a special verb form called a "gerund", which functions in sentences as a noun and therefore can properly be modified with a possessive adjective such as "your". In another kind of sentence, however, "you" would be preferred to "your", for example, "You, signing that check, were a picture of extreme reluctance."
The word that is always spelled incorrectly in the dictionary is INCORRECTLY. ha ha ha
The same difference there would be between words spelled incorrectly and correctly.
All the answers are correct.
Yes, "you'd" is a correct contraction of "you would" or "you had." It is commonly used in both spoken and written English to make sentences more concise. Just ensure that the context makes it clear which meaning is intended.
No, wroten is not a word. "Have you written" is correct.
The puppies are available for free would be the correct sentence to use.
No. Dromedary is the correct name for the one humped, or arabian camel.
The correct prefix for "guide" is "mis-", so the incorrect prefix would be something like "un-" or "dis-".
If I were you, the first thing I would do is learn to write. What you've written is at best, hard to follow. No punctuation, rolling sentences, misspelled or incorrectly used words. I was under the impression, that as a requirement of employment, the folks we have guarding our prisoners could at least enunciate.
The correct form is "Who has" when referring to a singular subject, and "Who have" when referring to a plural subject. For example, "Who has the keys?" and "Who have the keys?" would be correct based on the number of keys being referred to.
When two sentences are written as one and seperated by a comma, they are called a run-on or fused sentence.
No, it is not. "Whose client is Mr. Jackso[n]" or "Who is the client of Mr. Jackso[n]" would be correct sentences.
Well if you think about it- neither one is correct as it would be: To whom have you written to. or What have you written. or It says that you have written..... I hope this helped xx