answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

My personal opinion is 'dis' should be considered a prefix to the word 'crimination' and 'ion' also a suffix to the word 'criminate' which can be broken down further to the root 'crime'. I'm not sure of the origin if it is Latin, Hebrew or English. But when I search the word they aren't recognized as being related, but 'crim' is the central focus of several words that should have relation. Example incriminate, criminate, discriminate, criminal, indiscriminate, crime, dis-incrimination. Here are two words that you would think that by the root sound of them that the are rooted similar but not so those words are 'segregate' and 'integrate' they are antonyms. 'desegregation=integration' is equally opposite to 'segregation=disintegration'. The word of the day that needs defined shall be "crimate'.

User Avatar

btfojeff

Lvl 2
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

btfojeff

Lvl 1
2y ago
Also words have different meanings depending on the type of language and the context such as medical, legal or civil sometimes the words can change meaning and can become acquired meanings. Then describe discriminator, or indiscriminate.
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

No. It is part of the word. The easiest way to tell a prefix is if removing it leaves a word but changes its meaning. "Crimination" is not a word.

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

btfojeff

Lvl 1
2y ago
Wrong answer, the 'ion' is a suffix to the word "criminate"
User Avatar

btfojeff

Lvl 1
2y ago
Also a word is recrimination, re is a prefix again to the word 'crimination', which itself is a noun.

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In the word discrimination is dis considered a prefix?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp