No, the subject of the sentence is the proper noun 'Jim'.The pronoun in the sentence is 'her', direct object of the verb 'accused'.
The term 'your friend' (possessive adjective-noun combination) can be a subject of a sentence or clause, the object of a verb or a preposition.Subject: Your friend, Jim, is on the phone.Object of verb (direct object): You can call your friendon my phone.Object of verb (indirect object): Please give your friendmy phone number.Object of preposition: The message from your friend is on the counter. (object of the preposition 'from')
object
"You were in the mountains" does not have a direct object.
The verb does not have a direct object in the sentence, "She is insecure."
The proper noun Jim can be the subject of a sentence, the direct or indirect object of the sentence, or the object of a preposition. Examples: Subject: Jim is my friend. Direct object: There is Jim now. Indirect object: We gave Jim a gift for his birthday. Object of a preposition: It turned out to be a nice day for Jim.
A direct object receives the action of the verb, and an indirect object receives the direct object. Example: Maria kicked Jim the ball. "Ball" is receiving the action, "kicked". It is getting "kicked", so it is the direct object. "Jim" is receiving the "ball"- so "Jim" is the indirect object.
This is how you can distinguish/recognize the indirect object from the direct object.The indirect object always goes before the direct object. (direct object is bold / indirect subject is italics)I gave Jim the book.The indirect object can be changed into a phrase beginning with to.I gave the book to Jim
"Lesson" is the direct object; "archery" is the object of the preposition "in".
It can be it depends on what the sentence is. I bought a text book - direct object I gave Jim some money for a text book - indirect object.
Nothing wrong. "Jim" is the indirect object because he is who the bucks are owed to. The direct object is "bucks" because that is what is owed. However, if I put the direct object in a prepositional phrase (Like "to Jim"), the whole phrase becomes a modifier (of "bucks" in the example) and does not effect the sentence, leaving it without an indirect object. ex: Joe owes five bucks to Jim.
No, the subject of the sentence is the proper noun 'Jim'.The pronoun in the sentence is 'her', direct object of the verb 'accused'.
Some basic sentence patterns with examples are below: Noun + Verb: Jim runs. Noun + Verb + Adverb: Jim runs quickly. Adjective + Noun + Verb: Little Jim runs quickly. Noun + Verb + Direct Object: Jenny made a cake. Noun + Verb + Indirect Object + Direct Object: Jenny made Dad a cake.
The term 'your friend' (possessive adjective-noun combination) can be a subject of a sentence or clause, the object of a verb or a preposition.Subject: Your friend, Jim, is on the phone.Object of verb (direct object): You can call your friendon my phone.Object of verb (indirect object): Please give your friendmy phone number.Object of preposition: The message from your friend is on the counter. (object of the preposition 'from')
Between the sentences:"You saw what you expected to see.""Jim accused her for stealing the picture."The second sentence has an object pronoun her, direct object of the verb 'accused'.
object
"You were in the mountains" does not have a direct object.