It depends on what the video is. Many videos are copies of something else, so they would be secondary sources. However, some people create original videos and those would be primary sources.
See YouTube video link below.
See the YouTube video link below.
web video like YouTube, Google Video, Myspace, Metacafe, Dailymotion, iFilm, Music, eVideoShare, StreetFire, etc.
Zeroratedgprs show what data has been used and charged. Such charges could be from viewing a video on YouTube or internet browsing.
A- A transcript of a presidential speech
Raw, unedited video footage is considered a primary source.
If the source is primary or secondary and what type of source it is (i.e. video, photograph, etc.)
The thing that helps you to distinguish the primary and secondary source is that in the primary one you have actually proof in hand about it such as a book that the person wrote or their video. Secondary is a document that man analyzed and summed up.
There are two main sources: primary and secondary. A primary source would be "the document itself" or the testimony of an observer who was present at so-and-so. A secondary source would be eclectic documentation or testimony based on that of primary sources. For instance, a documentary of WWII would be a secondary source, which cites many primary sources such as interviews with veterans, clips of video or photos from the era, etc.
It depends on the content and purpose of the video. Some videos may be considered secondary sources if they analyze, comment on, or interpret primary sources. However, if the video presents original research or firsthand accounts, it could be considered a primary source.
No, YouTube is not open source. You can, however, access YouTube's API information should you want to develop an application for it.
Primary sources (in history) are things such as documents produced at the time. A secondary source is something written later by a historian. Good examples of primary source documents are legal notices, letters, diaries, newspapers, maps, flags, important documents, clothes, and even furniture.
To source a YouTube video effectively, you can provide the video title, the channel name, the upload date, and the URL link to the video. Additionally, you should include the creator's name and any relevant information about the video's content or context.
No, YouTube videos are generally not considered reliable sources for academic or formal research.
Both of the secondary and primary cameras are located on a mobile phone, but they are in opposite spots. The secondary camera is on the back of the phone and has the best picture quality of the two. The primary camera is on the front and has lower quality as its mainly used for video chats and taking self-portraits.
It definitely could be if it is unwanted. If a source is from a YouTube video though, like from an interview, then it may be appropriate to cite the video as a reference.
YouTube was created on Febuary 2005 by three former PayPal workers. source Wikipedia