That's a tricky one. At common law, truth was a defense to a charge of libel (written) or slander (spoken). States have rewritten the law, so something called "disparagement" may not be subject to a defense of truth. As corporations dominate our legislatures and congress, disparagement frequently turns not on truth but on whether you intended to hurt the person or business. (And succeeded, since harm is usually still a requirement).
A simple example of a conditional statement is: If a function is differentiable, then it is continuous. An example of a converse is: Original Statement: If a number is even, then it is divisible by 2. Converse Statement: If a number is divisible by 2, then it is even. Keep in mind though, that the converse of a statement is not always true! For example: Original Statement: A triangle is a polygon. Converse Statement: A polygon is a triangle. (Clearly this last statement is not true, for example a square is a polygon, but it is certainly not a triangle!)
Scientific law
hypothesis
Archetypes never appear as symbols.
a;; of the above are correct.
True. The first statement is true and the second statement is false. In a disjunction, if either statement is true, the disjunction is true.
true
Downward velocity is considered a negative. This is a true statement.
It depends what the statement is.
cost must be considered when designing technology
Yes, all sentences that can be classified as either true or false are considered statements. Statements are assertions that can be evaluated as either being factually accurate (true) or incorrect (false).
An axiom, in Geometry, is a statement that we assume is true. Whether it is actually true or not is irrelevant. For the purpse of solving the problem, it is considered to be true.
No such process assumes this to be a true statement. In the US all citizens are considered to be equal under the law. -Supposedly-
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
In order to determine if this is an inverse, you need to share the original conditional statement. With a conditional statement, you have if p, then q. The inverse of such statement is if not p then not q. Conditional statement If you like math, then you like science. Inverse If you do not like math, then you do not like science. If the conditional statement is true, the inverse is not always true (which is why it is not used in proofs). For example: Conditional Statement If two numbers are odd, then their sum is even (always true) Inverse If two numbers are not odd, then their sum is not even (never true)
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
A general statement that is considered true and covers a broad range of knowledge is too general. This type of statement tends to be less useful than one that is specific.