No, irregardless is not a real word. When someone says it, they mean to say regardless.
The word doesn't even make sense because "ir" and "less" both mean not or without, so they cancel each other out. The technical term, then, is holding something with regard. But this isn't even a real world, so the meaning is irrelevant.
You might hear it in popular culture (I even had to do a double take when I heard it on the television the other day!), but just remember that it's not a word, no matter who uses it incorrectly.
No. The proper word is "regardless." See the Related Link.
A word that can be used for an antonym for the word although is irregardless.
No, "irregardless" contains a double negative. "Regardless" is proper English, but "irregardless" is not.
Preventive
yes it is a real word
Yes, despite a widespread belief that irregardless is not a real word, it is in face a word- it's a combination of 'irrespective' and 'regardless.' It is recognized by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary and the Oxford English Dictionary.
No. "Irregardless" is not a word. "Dictionaries that list the word "irregardless" list it as "non-standard." This means that they recognize the word has common use, but really isn't a proper word. So, you can use the word as it is a "real" word, recognized by dictionaries, but you would be much better off using the proper word, regardless of the "trendy kids."
Irregardless is not an actual word. Regarless is the word you are looking for...in fact, irregardless is a double negative, so not a word x 2. "ir" means not "regard" means to make note of "less" means no more IRREGARDLESS =Not making note of, and it means no more.
(Usually the word is simply an excessive way to use the adverb regardless.)He was determined to complete his climb irregardless of the risk to his men.
No. The proper word is "regardless." See the Related Link.
A word that can be used for an antonym for the word although is irregardless.
There is no such standard word as irregardless... it is simply "regardless". The nonstandard word irregardless is redundant. The prefix ir- means not. People intend irregardless to mean without regard for some information, or without taking certain information into consideration. But it would really mean "Not [ir-] without regard" [regardless].When used, the word irregardless carries the unfortunate sense that an uninformed person is attempting to appear learned. Regardless of what others may say, avoid "irregardless". Ex: Regardless, Steve is A gay.
It is a casual,nonstandard phrase and is spelled irregardless
No, irregardless is not a real word. When someone says it, they mean to say regardless. The word doesn't even make sense because "ir" and "less" both mean not or without, so they cancel each other out. The technical term, then, is holding something with regard. But this isn't even a real world, so the meaning is irrelevant. You might hear it in popular culture (I even had to do a double take when I heard it on the television the other day!), but just remember that it's not a word, no matter who uses it incorrectly.
No, "irregardless" contains a double negative. "Regardless" is proper English, but "irregardless" is not.
Yes it is, but the proper term is "regardless".
irregardless is not grammatically correct it is a double negative- the correct term is regardless