The correct phrase is - "Are you in London?."
Let's give an example. Deanie Etcetera of the Netherlands learns that her beloved, Mitch Longley, is in England visiting a friend. Deanie sends Mitch a text and says - "Hello Mitch, are you in London? We must meet."
I am at London.
It is correct
It is correct to say them both, but it matters on what you want to say.
no it is not correct to say enjoy your vacations
correct !
You should say for your convenience it is *gramatically correct-*just means correct
No, you must say I was in London yesterday.
It is grammatically correct to say: There is nothing wrong with this machine.It is not grammatically correct to say: Will it is be grammatically correct to say ....The correct way to write that or say that would be: Would it be grammatically correct to say....
Cheerio
"Back in London" is correct.
Most people in London speak English as for most of the UK.
near to London
You would nearly always say 'in London'. Only for a specific place within London would you say 'at', for example 'at Buckingham Palace in London'.
One could say "I would be on holiday to London" or "I would go on holiday to London" depending on what they are trying to express. The first one implies an explanation, for instance "Were I to go on the vacation, I would be on holiday to London" and the second implies where one would go, if one were to go on vacation.
It should be FCA- London airport
Not exactly. London is the capital city of England, which is part of the UK.
London = Λονδίνο [Lontheeno]
amore London