The correct phrase is - "Are you in London?."
Let's give an example. Deanie Etcetera of the Netherlands learns that her beloved, Mitch Longley, is in England visiting a friend. Deanie sends Mitch a text and says - "Hello Mitch, are you in London? We must meet."
It is correct
It is correct to say them both, but it matters on what you want to say.
no it is not correct to say enjoy your vacations
You should say for your convenience it is *gramatically correct-*just means correct
no it is not correct to say you are not for sure instead you can say in proper English that you are not sure about something
No, you must say I was in London yesterday.
It is grammatically correct to say: There is nothing wrong with this machine.It is not grammatically correct to say: Will it is be grammatically correct to say ....The correct way to write that or say that would be: Would it be grammatically correct to say....
Cheerio
"Back in London" is correct.
near to London
Most people in London speak English as for most of the UK.
Yes, the sentence is correct. It conveys that the speaker expects to visit London from time to time in the future.
One could say "I would be on holiday to London" or "I would go on holiday to London" depending on what they are trying to express. The first one implies an explanation, for instance "Were I to go on the vacation, I would be on holiday to London" and the second implies where one would go, if one were to go on vacation.
It should be FCA- London airport
Not exactly. London is the capital city of England, which is part of the UK.
amore London
London = Λονδίνο [Lontheeno]