Whether it is "one lakh", "two lakh" or "fifty lakh", the word is written in singular and not in plural. Please note that the word "lakh" takes the singular form but the word following "lakh" takes the plural form. You can say " two lakh rupees" or " five lakh tonnes" but not " two lakhs rupees" or "five lakhs tonnes". This is on the analogy of the words " million" and "billion". For example, we say " 5 million" or " 5 billion dollars" but not "5 millions" / " 5 billions dollars". However, in a table of figures, you can say " in lakhs of rupees" and not " in lakh of rupees".
The correct spelling is one hundred and seventy-nine.
When referring to yourself it is a capitial 'I' as in "Can I have a cup of tea, please?" It should not be "Can i have a cup of tea, please?"
One explanation is that this comes from a "lass and a lakh a day" - a lakh being 100,000 rupees. This indicated the lavish lifestyle of white 'servants' (i.e. employees) of the English East India Company in Bengal, in the 18th century.
One word is the correct answer. So you would write it as footprint.An example sentence is: forensics recovered the footprint from the mud.
I prefer one of the following:I am getting an error. We are getting an error.I'm getting an error. We're getting an error.
A lakh (not lac) is a number used in India and is equivalent to 100,000. Hence 'one lakh rupees' etc.
1.8 lakh crore how to wright
one lakh two hundred is written as 100200
It is 10100.
1,60,000
In words, the answer is one lakh twenty five thousand, exactly as in the question!
1000000
1,07,000
1,70,000
It is 1,03,000.
1,20,000
1,10,000