No, this is grammatically incorrect. You only use names like Jim or I when they are the subject, not after the verb.
These two similar sentences are equally alike and grammatically correct:
1. Jim and I will contact you.
2. Please contact Jim or me.
Please contact Jim or me
or
Please contact Jim or myself
Probably not. It's hard to judge grammar based on a sentence fragment rather than a complete sentence, but it's difficult to think of a sentence in which that would be correct.
"She did not have" is the proper grammar.
There are many grammar practice websites that will help people learn proper English grammar. These are necessary since many people have no idea what proper grammar is these days.
If you're referring to actor Kelsey Grammer, then yes, Grammer is a proper noun. If you meant to write grammar, then no, it's not a proper noun.
(B) The word for the application of proper English usage is "grammar".
Yes, "The house is not as cheap as he thought" is proper grammar.
"She did not have" is the proper grammar.
It is proper grammar.
"Don't it" is not proper grammar. The correct form is "doesn't it".
It is proper grammar to say, "I bet you".
no, that is definitely not proper grammar.
Yes, starting a sentence with "then" is grammatically correct, especially when showing a sequence of events or actions. However, it is usually used sparingly to avoid overuse and maintain variety in sentence structure.
What was there is proper grammar.
"Into" is used to indicate movement or direction, while "in to" is used when "in" is part of a verb phrase (e.g., "to turn in to the parking lot").
no
There are many grammar practice websites that will help people learn proper English grammar. These are necessary since many people have no idea what proper grammar is these days.
The proper grammar is "There has come a time." "There" is the subject of the sentence and is singular, hence the correct verb form to use is "has" instead of "have."
It's you are, you is is not proper grammar.