yes.
The word respond is a verb. It means to answer or to reply.
No. It is the past tense of the verb to reply.
Both are terms, but for different aspects of a reply. You would decide what form and language to use "for the reply to Anne." If you were describing the contents of the reply, not the form, you would say that a word or phrase was "in the reply to Anne."
No.received is past tense and the action of receive has not happened. Also any reply should be a reply.But the better way would be to say:We have not received a reply from you yet. -- as an adverb yet is usually placed at the end of the sentence.
Please reply to our invitation by September, 1, 2012. He raised his hand to reply to the teacher's question.
Reply is a verb (reply, replies, replied, replying).
Reply can be used as a noun or a verb. Noun: I expect your reply by tonight. Verb: Please reply no later than Monday.
Yes, replied is a verb. Specifically, it is the past tense of the verb "to reply".
The present tense of "reply" is simply "reply" itself, unless the subject of the verb in the third person singular. In that instance, the verb is "replies".
Reply is the correct form of the verb reply (replies for third person singular). Replied is the past tense and past participle, and replying is the present participle.
No, it is not. It is a verb meaning to reply.
The word respond is a verb. It means to answer or to reply.
"Reply" is a verb that can be used to indicate a response to something.
No. It is the past tense of the verb to reply.
The word reply is a noun as well as a verb. Example uses:Noun: I haven't received a reply to my request for a transcript.Verb: You can reply to the invitation that we will be happy to attend the cookout.
No, it is not. Reply can be a verb (to respond) or a noun (a response).
The present perfect tense of "reply" is "have replied" or "has replied." This tense is formed by using the auxiliary verb "have" or "has" followed by the past participle form of the verb, in this case "replied."