Yes.
While I must say the question was hard to read, I do believe it's possible.
PS: I just did.
"You are" is present tense, happening now,, while "sat" is past tense. so this sentence doesn't work. :" You are sitting writing this," although awkward is correct.
I ate the ketchup, and she drank the motor oil; it was a disaster.
Yes. Many people think there is a rule against ending a sentence with a preposition. If that were true, then it would not be grammatically correct to say, "Where are you from?" However, most grammarians do not think there is such a rigid rule. Although you could avoid the preposition at the end by saying "From where are you?", that is not how people actually speak and write English. So most would say that it is perfectly correct to say, "Where are you from?"
It is not correct. The correct sentence should be as follows: "At what time would you come?" or 'At what time would you like to come?" or "At what time will you come?" or "would you come at what time?" or "Will you come at what time?" or "At what time will you like to come?" The verb 'should' is not used while asking questions since should is used a modal verb--which does not change its form with first, second or third person nouns or pronouns--used sparingly almost in imperative sentences and in sentences that suggestive of advice.
The correct way to start a sentence with a number is to spell it out... For example... 'Three people were injured' is correct while '3 people were injured' is not.
Yes, very correct.
There are scenarios in which it is possible to start a sentence with the word "while," and still be grammatically correct. It may be used in statements that highlight simultaneous action.
The correct phrase to use depends on the context of the sentence. "To be" is used as an infinitive verb phrase, while "to being" is not grammatically correct in standard English. For example, "I like to be alone" is correct, while "I like to being alone" is not.
"You are" is present tense, happening now,, while "sat" is past tense. so this sentence doesn't work. :" You are sitting writing this," although awkward is correct.
Not technically: the compound subject uses the plural verb are."There are a spoon and a fork on the plate."But colloquially this construction, while erroneous, is very common. It could also be grammatically correct if the spoon is not on the plate (set off by a comma)."There is a spoon, and a fork on the plate." (and there is a fork on the plate)
No: it requires an object for the verb "open". It would be correct to say something like "We must not open burning packages." Yes, if it means "We must not open (our shop, for example) while it is on fire.
No, the correct sentence is "She called me when I was there." The pronoun "I" should always be capitalized in English, and "was" should be used instead of "i was".
Yes, both "two homes" and "two houses" are grammatically correct. "Two homes" refers to two places where people live or reside, while "two houses" specifically refers to two dwellings that are separate structures. The choice between the two terms depends on the context and the intended meaning.
"More better" in any context is grammatically incorrect. The verb tenses are better and best. "Better than before" is grammatically correct. Example sentence: While the judges thought Mary's cake was better than before, they decided John's baking was better.
While grammatically, it is not correct, it is still understandable. To make it correct it would need to be:Voy a la piscina a nadar.
I ate the ketchup, and she drank the motor oil; it was a disaster.
"Please be advised" is used to inform or notify someone about something, while "please advise" is used to ask for guidance or instructions from someone. The former is more of a statement, while the latter is a request for information.