Yes. It is the question form of the statement "we are understood."
This can have two uses. One is just the simple question, as if asking in a foreign language situation. The other is the "royal we" used by some authority figures to make a point, rather than saying "do you comprehend the instructions that I am giving you?"
Yes. Perfect. The noun is an understood you and it is a complete sentence.
No. In songs and in poems, sometimes improper grammar is used but it is understood to be used in a poetic way, not exactly a grammatically correct way. I think "love me do" is from a song.
yes, "you discribed to my mother and me" is correct grammar, however the form of the question could be made more clear.
"G-R-A-M-M-A-R" (You should know, since you spelled it out in your question.)
"On a train" is correct grammar.
It depends on context. For example, in a conversation between two people: Person #1: Those items are not for sale. Person #2: Which are? In that context, it is understood that "Which are?" means "Which items are for sale?"
No, the question should be "What does she have?" in correct grammar. The verb "have" is used in the present simple tense for the third person singular, which is "has" in this case.
The grammar in the question is correct.
Yes. Perfect. The noun is an understood you and it is a complete sentence.
Snobbish girl is correct but your question is not.Written correctly, your question would be:Is snobbish girl correct grammar?
No. In songs and in poems, sometimes improper grammar is used but it is understood to be used in a poetic way, not exactly a grammatically correct way. I think "love me do" is from a song.
NO. Use her and me. Never use "I" for the object of a verb or preposition, which in this case is the understood "to."
Your question makes no sense! xx
this question contains incorrect grammar. i will not answer this question until the poster rewrites this phrase in correct grammar. ILY!
There is no sentence in the question on which to base an opinion.
The sentence does not pose a question of grammar, but of sense. Norway is a country, and as such it cannot be an industry. The sentence would be better understood if it read: Norway has had a great fishing industry for a long time.
A context-free grammar can generate languages that regular grammars cannot, as it allows for the use of non-terminal symbols in productions. Regular grammars, on the other hand, are less powerful and can only generate regular languages, which are a subset of context-free languages. Context-free grammars are more expressive and have more flexibility in rule definitions compared to regular grammars.