All you need to say is it's green. The "in color" already implied & redundant.
It is grammatically correct in that all the parts of it are properly arranged according to their parts of speech and function.However, it has no meaning. The word 'hypothetical' refers to 'hypothesis.' which is a statement proposed as an explanation of something, like a theory. You can't say that a person is like that. Those are characteristics that can't belong to a person.It is perfectly possible to form a grammatical sentence that has no meaning. Chomsky's famous sentence "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously" was composed as an example of that. Your sentence is another.
The sentence 'Lea's first green head band ever she wore' is not correct grammar. There is no verb (predicate). A complete sentence might say "Lea's green headband was the first one she ever wore."
the varations of colour on are straberry are red when they are ripe and white and green when not ripe the varations of colour on are straberry are red when they are ripe and white and green when not ripe the varations of colour on are straberry are red when they are ripe and white and green when not ripe
Gwyrdd (green) Glas (green grey) Ir (fresh, green, raw)
Because the plants cultivated in it are generally green in colour.
The green moss was most slippery when it was wet.
Yes it is grammatically correct but it is ambiguous. Were the wedding guests wearing green glasses or was the ice tea served in green glasses? In the first case the sentence would be better to read "Iced tea was served to the wedding guests who were wearing green glasses." in the second case It would read "Iced tea was served in green glasses to the wedding guests."
Because they're green, and they are grammatically correct.
number 1 is correct because it is a complete sentence
blue :) - That is not correct the are acctualy green!(:
The phrase "colorless green ideas sleep furiously" is a famous example of a sentence that is grammatically correct but nonsensical. It was coined by linguist Noam Chomsky to demonstrate that language can follow rules without conveying meaning. In this case, the words are arranged in a way that is syntactically correct but semantically absurd.
Blue, Orange, Green, Green, Yellow (BOGGY)
The Ocean was beautifully a blue-green colour.
In British English, the correct spellings are colour and favourite."Green is my favourite colour".In American English, the correct spellings are color and favorite."That color is not my favorite".
Yes, if the sentence is supposed to be in present tense.
It is grammatically correct in that all the parts of it are properly arranged according to their parts of speech and function.However, it has no meaning. The word 'hypothetical' refers to 'hypothesis.' which is a statement proposed as an explanation of something, like a theory. You can't say that a person is like that. Those are characteristics that can't belong to a person.It is perfectly possible to form a grammatical sentence that has no meaning. Chomsky's famous sentence "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously" was composed as an example of that. Your sentence is another.
Green is a colour the colour of growing grass or leaves. Green is also frequently taken to mean 'on' a green light means that the power is on, 'go' green traffic light mean it is permitted to go forward, 'OK' green is used to mean that everything is all correct.