answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, in the example clause, "...you would love too." the adverb "too" is modifying the verb "would love" as also.

Example: I have a book that you would love too. (would love also).

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is the word too used correctly in this sentence i too love you?

It would be more normal to say I love you too, rather than I too love you, and furthermore, to be correct it would need commas: I, too, love you.


Is the word too used correctly in this sentence I love you too?

Yes, this is because the word too usually means also in sentences like this. So the sentence would be "I love you also" which makes perfect sense.


Which one of sentence below contains a correctly used modifier in italics?

The word "looked" is a correctly used modifier in the sentence.


How do you use the word you'll in a sentence?

You'll be in trouble if you don't listen to your parents.


Is condolences used correctly in this sentence My condolences to you and your family?

I think that the above sentence used in this term, is correctly used in this way.


Is the apostrophe in the sentence it's up to you to decide what to do used correctly?

In the sentence, It's up to you to decide, It's is used as a contraction for It is. It's used correctly here.


In the present of our loved ones we will exchange vows of marriage in Christ's love My question is the word present used correctly in this sentence?

The word present is used incorrectly in this sentence. 'present' usually means: * a gift * to make known formally * to produce and this does not make sense in the context of the sentence. The sentence should read: "In the presence of our loved ones we will exchange vows of marriage in Christ's love"


Are dashes correctly used in this sentence?

Yes; there are none.


Is welcomed used correctly in the sentence You are most welcomed?

No, it is not used correctly. The correct way to use it is You are most welcome.


Which sentence below contains a correctly used modifier in italic?

The sentence "She quickly ran to the store to buy some groceries" contains a correctly used modifier in italic.


Many of you have become lacks and are consistantly late. Is the word lacks correctly used in the preceeding sentence?

No, the word "lacks" is not used correctly in the sentence. The correct word should be "lax," which means lacking in strictness or care. So the corrected sentence would be: "Many of you have become lax and are consistently late."


Is the word regarding in this sentence correct?

In the above sentence the word regarding is used correctly.