Yes but depending on the context you should have -- a/thedocument has been printed
"Have you traveled before?" The auxiliary verb "have been" is used with the present participle, "traveling."
No this is grammatically incorrect. Some correct examples would be:Has she already been informed about this?Has she already informed him about this?Has she already informed them about this?
Either could be correct, depending on context. "The thief has been located in the library." (The thief is inside the walls of the library.) "The thief has been located at the library." (The thief could be anywhere on the library grounds.)
No, that is not correct. First of all 'much' is wrong with 'they'. It could have been "How many are they?. But if you have to ask the price of something you could ask- "How much is it for?" or "How much do they cost?" for more than a single item. In an informal way you might ask "How much for them?" or just "How much?"
That is the way most people would say it, but most people are wrong. It is against the rules of English grammar to have a preposition at the end of a sentence without its object. To avoid that, the question can be rephrased "To which foreign countries have you been?"
No, the correct grammar would be: "July has just started."
The correct grammar is "you have just been." This structure follows the typical order of subject (you) + auxiliary verb (have) + adverb (just) + main verb (been).
I believe it is "have"
The correct grammar is "You have been here for four months."
the grammar is correct. i think.
No. Not in any grammar I've herd.
The correct verb is had been.Examples:This workout studio had been a gas station at one time.Jerome had been waiting for an hour.
"You have always been the best" would be more grammatically correct.
government controls HAVE been abolished
The correct sentence is: "Have you ever traveled before?"
Probably not. Some printed editions of Ars Minor, a schoolbook on Latin grammar by Aelius Donatus may have been printed by Gutenberg; these have been dated either 1451-52 or 1455.
No, OCR works on bitmaps. A PDF document is not a bitmap untill the PDF has been printed and scanned in as a bitmap.