yes
This sentence is not grammatically correct. For the sentence to be grammatically correct, the space between "in" and "to" would have to be removed. Therefore the sentence should read "They are into skating."
Certainly. The sentence has a subject, a verb, and an object modified by an adjective. It would still be correct grammatically if it ran " You drank an imaginary bus." Remember that "grammatically correct" and "meaningful" are not the same.
probably in, but there are instances where on would be correct - it depends on context.
I think it would be the winner was she
no you would say i have a hundred
The question appears to be incorrect...Would: "That is her boyfriend." be grammatically correct? Is a correct question that can be answered in the affermative: Yes.
No, the grammatically correct sentence would be: "I am annoyed by the way you behave."
Yes, "He sailed his boat on the river" is grammatically correct.
Not. "Are you angry to me?" would be correct.
The phrase "how don't I" is not grammatically correct. A more correct way to phrase it would be "why don't I."
It is grammatically correct to say: There is nothing wrong with this machine.It is not grammatically correct to say: Will it is be grammatically correct to say ....The correct way to write that or say that would be: Would it be grammatically correct to say....
This sentence is not grammatically correct. For the sentence to be grammatically correct, the space between "in" and "to" would have to be removed. Therefore the sentence should read "They are into skating."
No, the correct phrasing would be "Where was I?" to form a complete and grammatically correct question.
Set would be grammatically correct.
Yes, that sentence would be grammatically correct.
It is not, but it is widely used because it conveys the general idea of the question as well as its grammatically correct version.No you should say "Where are you" the at at the end is not needed.
"Would have run" is correct grammar. "Would of run" is a common error known as a homophonic mistake, where "of" is mistakenly used instead of "have."