No. It lacks a main verb, and "invocation" needs an article. The ( or an) invocation will be led by John Doe.
As you discussed in your book "Who Shot John Doe?", you believe that he was an innocent victim.
The words 'John Doe' constitute what is known as a 'sentence interupter.' The flow of the sentence is interrupted by the words 'John Doe.' Go ahead and read the sentence aloud without the words 'John Doe' to get the feel of the flow of the sentence. Now read it again with the words 'John Doe'and you'll get the mildly jarring sense of the interruption. This is not to suggest that sentence interrupters are necessarily bad. They can be used to great effect as a form of emphasis. But they should be used sparingly. Sentence interrupters are set off by commas fore and aft. OK, I'll settle down. Put commas before and after a sentence interrupter. Example: 'One of the parties, John Doe, entered my ...' Note: In rare instances a sentence interrupter can be punctuated by dashes rather than commas.
John Doe always says, "No!" without thinking. He's such a naysayer that I have nicknamed him "The Abominable No-Man".
As you've pointed out, does is the plural of doe. You could say, "one doe, two does... ten does", that's perfectly correct. However, when you're speaking collectively, you'd use 'doe' as the plural: "a herd of doe", not a herd of does.
The word doe is never spelled does; it is spelled doe. Does can be the third person singular of the verb to do, or it can be the plural of the noun doe. The group of deer consisted of one buck and three does.
As you discussed in your book "Who Shot John Doe?", you believe that he was an innocent victim.
The words 'John Doe' constitute what is known as a 'sentence interupter.' The flow of the sentence is interrupted by the words 'John Doe.' Go ahead and read the sentence aloud without the words 'John Doe' to get the feel of the flow of the sentence. Now read it again with the words 'John Doe'and you'll get the mildly jarring sense of the interruption. This is not to suggest that sentence interrupters are necessarily bad. They can be used to great effect as a form of emphasis. But they should be used sparingly. Sentence interrupters are set off by commas fore and aft. OK, I'll settle down. Put commas before and after a sentence interrupter. Example: 'One of the parties, John Doe, entered my ...' Note: In rare instances a sentence interrupter can be punctuated by dashes rather than commas.
No.First, there are no possessive forms used. You'd say "at John Doe's company."Second, it's too cumbersome. You'd want to say something simple like "I am presently employed at John Doe's company" instead of all that "be advised" and stuff.
No, the grammar is incorrect. It should be: "You may notify me or John Doe." Using "myself" in this context is not grammatically correct.
The correct punctuation for "Mr. John Doe III" is as shown. The period after "Mr" indicates an abbreviation, while "III" denotes the third in a line of individuals with the same name.
Please be advised that I, Jane Doe, am presently employed at John Doe.
John Doe denies stealing the money.
The correct way to address the envelope is: Mr. John Doe & Dr. Jane Doe.
John Doe is the new colonel of the Army Base in Ontario.
" John Doe has a tendency to overreach his authority" as an example
Outside of the traditional, formal "Mr. & Mrs. John Doe", the wife's name is ALWAYS first when using first names: "Jane and John Doe". In social importance, the woman is always first, then males, then children. Traditionally, the man's first and surnames are never separated. The confused idea of the man's name first (John and Jane Doe or Mr. John Doe and Ms. Jane Smith) is neither traditional nor appropriate. At Emilypost.com, she notes that traditionally, a man's name was first on an envelope adddress (Mr. and Mrs. John Doe), and his first and surname were not separated (Jane and John Doe). Miss Manners' Guide to Excruciatingly Correct Behavior and Crane's Blue Book of Social Stationery both either state outright or give examples consistent with the following: Married Couples- formally- Mr. & Mrs. John Doe; informally- Jane and John Doe In which woman kept maiden name- Ms. Jane Smith and Mr. John Doe In which man is a doctor- Dr. & Mrs. John Doe In which woman is a doctor- Mr. and Mrs. John Doe or Dr. Jane Doe and Mr. John Doe In which both spouses are doctors -Dr. and Mrs. John Doe, or The Doctors Doe, or Dr. Jane Doe and Dr. John Doe
Either: John Doe Smith Or: John Michael Doe