The term theirself is not a word. The suffix "self" is only applied to the pronouns my, your, him, or her (singular), and "selves" to our, your, or them (plural)
"I have never seen someone so clearly unaware of himself (or herself)" would be proper form. (But the exact meaning here is still vague : aware of what aspect of himself?)
* Although the Oxford Dictionary, Collins Dictionary, and Chambers Dictionary list the non-gender-specific themself, it is not standard English. Where the gender could be either, it is better to use a different sentence structure to eliminate the "self".
It really depends on what the complete sentence.
The adverb form of clear is clearly.An example sentence is: "he is clearly a bit crazy".
The castanet clicked quickly and clearly.
noting or pertaining to a sentence that is easily parsed incorrectly because its beginning suggests it has an interpretation that it clearly does not have.
stop talking all that gibberish and speak clearly. that is a sentence using the word gibberish
To correct a dangling participle, you should clarify the noun that the participle is modifying in the sentence. This can be done by rephrasing the sentence, moving the participle closer to the noun it should modify, or adding a subject for the participle. This helps to ensure that the sentence is grammatically correct and conveys the intended meaning clearly.
It really depends on what the complete sentence.
Correct: The words of the puppeteers must be spoken clear for all to hear. (The wrong perfect tense of the word was used)
Subject-verb agreement is important in writing because it ensures that the sentence is grammatically correct and easy to understand. When the subject and verb agree in number and person, it helps to convey the intended meaning clearly and effectively.
Although it is generally considered a stylistic preference to avoid beginning a sentence with a preposition, it is not grammatically incorrect to do so. It is acceptable to start a sentence with a preposition as long as it helps convey your intended meaning clearly and effectively.
clearly i went to get bread from the lovely shop
Using "back" and "again" together in the same sentence is redundant because both words convey the idea of repetition or return. It is unnecessary to use both in the same sentence because they essentially mean the same thing. Instead, you can choose one word to convey your meaning more clearly and concisely.
It clearly wasn't his day...Or was it?
No. In this case, "it" was clearly not held now, and so this is a "contrary to fact condition" calling for the present subjunctive: If it were held now... Grammatically, yes. All a sentence really needs is a noun and a verb, but it doesn't really make sence. It is mixing past, present and future/possible tenses in such a way that is confusing to the ear.
Example sentence - His children were clearly ungrateful for the efforts he made for them.
The sentence "a groan cat it's for..." contains several issues. First, "groan cat" appears to be a typographical error or a nonsensical phrase; it likely should be "grown cat" or "groaning cat," depending on the intended meaning. Additionally, the phrase "it's for" lacks context and does not clearly convey what the subject is intended for. Overall, the sentence requires clarification and correction to be grammatically and contextually coherent.
The adverb form of clear is clearly.An example sentence is: "he is clearly a bit crazy".