no
Not necessarily. There is no word in English that requires a comma after it or before it.
Depending on what the sentence is about you may use a comma before 'called';however, in some instances you may not be allowed to place a comma before the word called.
Yes, and here is a good example.
In many cases, the word 'however' is followed by a comma. The problem with the word is that one must be careful not to over use a comma. However the word is used,(note that there is no comma used in this connection) the word itself frequently does not need a comma as an automatic punctuation.However, (meaning 'on the other hand') phrasing will most often determine if the word is followed by a comma. These two instances here are examples of when to use or not use the comma as punctuation for this word. When the word is used as a substitute for the phrase 'on the other hand', it is most often followed by a comma.
This is a good question. What you are talking about is called the serial comma, or sometimes the Oxford comma. It is a comma before the last item (actually, before the "and") in a series of three or more things. Whether you should use the serial comma is matter of style. It is generally acceptable to use this comma or to omit it. Different publications follow different style sheets: one might require you to use this comma, and another to omit it. People can have strong opinions about whether to use the serial comma. Those who think it should be used believe the style to be more consistent and clearer, and can cite examples in legal documents in which the comma made a major difference in the terms of an inheritance. Those who think it should not be used believe that it serves no purpose and does not add anything except an extra character. Examples using the serial comma: He got up, made coffee, ate breakfast, took a shower, and got ready to go to work. She works at the store on Monday, Tuesday, Friday, and Saturday. The same examples, but without the serial comma: He got up, made coffee, ate breakfast, took a shower and got ready to go to work. She works at the store on Monday, Tuesday, Friday and Saturday.
"Inc" is not a word, it's an abbreviation for "Incorporated," and there should be a comma before it.
no
It is usually appropriate to place a comma before "but." One should not use a comma after "but."
No, a comma is not needed before and after the word "again" if it is in the middle of a sentence.
No, a comma does not go before the word 'in'.
In a compound sentence, the comma would be placed before the word but.
A comma should typically come before the word "but" when it is used to connect two independent clauses. If "but" is used to join two elements within a single clause, then a comma is usually not necessary.
A comma is generally used before "which" in non-restrictive clauses, but not when it introduces a restrictive clause. As for dates, it is common to include a comma after the year when it is followed by additional information in a sentence.
a comma should always precede but. Especially if it is joining a compound sentence. For example,Michael is tall, but Shawn is taller.I want to go to school, but I have to do my homework.
A comma before "which" depends on whether it introduces a nonessential clause. If the information following "which" is necessary for the sentence's meaning, no comma is needed. However, if the clause is nonessential, a comma before "which" is appropriate.
A comma before "and" depends on the context. Use a comma before "and" in a list of items (e.g., red, blue, and green). However, do not use a comma before "and" when it connects two independent clauses unless it is needed for clarity or to avoid confusion.
Not necessarily. There is no word in English that requires a comma before or after it.