Unless "Get" is the name of a person, the word "get" should never have an apostrophe because it does not show possession nor is it a contraction. The present tense form of get is "gets" but that does not have an apostrophe.
it's is a abbreviation of it is so it should have an apostrophe
No. Harringtons doesn't need an apostrophe.
No, Normans is a plural. An apostrophe is NEVER EVER used to indicate a plural. EVER.
If the word ends in apostrophe s or ends in s apostrophe, then there is NO space before or after the apostrophe, but always a space before the next word.
No, the word "that" does not require an apostrophe to show possession. The possessive form of "that" is simply "that's."
Unless "Get" is the name of a person, the word "get" should never have an apostrophe because it does not show possession nor is it a contraction. The present tense form of get is "gets" but that does not have an apostrophe.
If you're talking about more than one employee, then don't use an apostrophe. Plural words should never have an apostrophe. If you're talking about something that belongs to a single employee (such as "the employee's computer") then you need an apostrophe.
The word "its" does not require an apostrophe when used as a possessive pronoun. Only use "its' " when it is a contraction for "it is" or "it has," and never as a possessive form.
it's is a abbreviation of it is so it should have an apostrophe
It should not have an apostrophe.
No. Harringtons doesn't need an apostrophe.
Never. As apostrophes represent ownership or a contraction I do not believe sees has an apostrophe.
Should not = shouldn't
Yes, the sentence should have an apostrophe to denote possession. It should be written as: "Linda and her vice presidents' are going to Brazil."
No, Normans is a plural. An apostrophe is NEVER EVER used to indicate a plural. EVER.
No there shouldn't be an apostrophe.