Dative
Offer
Indirect objects are functionally the objects of prepositional phrases in which the preposition is missing (e.g. I gave him the book. = I gave the book to him.) If "wait" is used as a verb, the preposition is included, causing "wait" be be properly labeled as a prepositional object rather than an indirect object. For example, we might say, "I wait for her." but we don't say, "I wait her." "Wait" may be itself be the indirect object of a sentence in its infinitive form (e.g. "Her plan was to wait."). Without the infinitive indicator "to", however, the infinitive normally serves as either an adjective or adverb (e.g. "You made me wait."), not a noun, and therefore not an object. In short, assuming you mean to use "wait" as a verb, I'm unaware of any case in which it can be used with an indirect object.
Pronouns in the objective case; they are her, him, me, them, us, it, and you. Whom can be an objective pronoun as well.
The indirect object is often used right before a direct object and doesnot follow a preposition, as illustrated in the phrases above. If a preposition is used, then the word becomes the object of that preposition, as in the following, where to and for are prepositions and man and yourself are their objects: I throw the ball to you. Ball is the direct object and you is the indirect object because ball rephrase what you throw and you rephrase throw to whom?
Pronouns used as direct objects in a sentence must be objective pronouns.The objective personal pronouns: me, him, her, them.The personal pronouns that are subjective or objective: you, it.
The nominative case is used for the subject of a sentence or the predicate nominative, while the objective case is used for direct objects, indirect objects, and objects of prepositions. In English, pronouns change form depending on whether they are in the nominative or objective case.
In a word, no! For nouns and adjectives, the final -n is used in the accusative case only, not as an oblique/objective case as are "him", "me" in English. For adverbs, -n is used only in the accusative of direction.
No, "them" is a pronoun typically used as an indirect object or an object of a preposition in a sentence. A direct object receives the action of the verb directly.
Offer
It's unusual for a number to be used as an indirect object, but it can be done. For example, "Give the three of them the answer to question #7." In that sentence, "three" is the indirect object.
No, object pronouns, direct objects, and indirect objects are not interjections. Object pronouns replace nouns in sentences (e.g. "he" replaces "John"), direct objects receive the action of the verb (e.g. "I read the book"), and indirect objects receive the direct object (e.g. "I gave her a gift"). Interjections are words or phrases used to express strong feelings or emotions (e.g. "Wow!" or "Oops!").
Yes, indefinite pronouns can act as subjects, predicate nominatives, direct objects, indirect objects, objects of a preposition, and appositives in a sentence. They are versatile in that they can replace specific nouns while still maintaining the grammatical function of the original noun they are replacing.
Objective case pronouns are used as the objects of verbs or prepositions in a sentence. They can also act as indirect objects, receiving the action of the verb. For example, in the sentence "She gave him the book," "him" is the objective case pronoun serving as the indirect object of the verb "gave."
Magistram is the accusative singular form of the word magistra, which means "mistress." The accusative case is used for direct objects and for the objects of certain prepositions such as ad ("to") and apud ("near; at the home of").
The nominative case represents the subject of a sentence in Latin. This case is used for the subject of a sentence and is typically the first form listed in a Latin dictionary entry for nouns.
Indirect objects are functionally the objects of prepositional phrases in which the preposition is missing (e.g. I gave him the book. = I gave the book to him.) If "wait" is used as a verb, the preposition is included, causing "wait" be be properly labeled as a prepositional object rather than an indirect object. For example, we might say, "I wait for her." but we don't say, "I wait her." "Wait" may be itself be the indirect object of a sentence in its infinitive form (e.g. "Her plan was to wait."). Without the infinitive indicator "to", however, the infinitive normally serves as either an adjective or adverb (e.g. "You made me wait."), not a noun, and therefore not an object. In short, assuming you mean to use "wait" as a verb, I'm unaware of any case in which it can be used with an indirect object.
The Latin word for "if" is si. In addition, the word num can be translated "if" (or "whether") when used in indirect questions; for example, Quaesivit num venires, "He asked if you were coming".