To burn a surface but not destroy it - singe.
Completely is already an adverb. Removing the -ly puts it in adjective form.
by definition, turning into the opposite gender is a sex change, so no.
'From without' means, quite simply, 'from outside of'.To illustrate, look at this statement:"The power to change one's self comes from within."This statement essentially suggests that if one wants to change themselves, that change will start within them.But what if a certain person felt that the power to change is something that originates outside of themselves? The statement might look like this:"The power to change one's self comes from without."The popularity of 'from within' is considerably greater in common parlance than it's counter-part 'from without'. This is probably because 'from without' seems confusing at first. In fact, I have found myself using 'from without' in many of my own writings in the past, and I oftentimes consider rephrasing simply because it sounds awkward.
Change is inevitable because without change, no mistakes can be learned from, and the whole world would be stuck in a rut on how to do the most common and simple things we know today that require change.
This is when a gas goes straight to a solid without turing into a liquid.
To char. Or braise.
I think that would be "searing".
to sear meat to carmelize onions and garlic and sugar
To Scorch
Yes, they do change the surface as a mass of snow falls destroying almost everything in it's path such as buildings and trees'.
Easy to change the shape of without destroying the integrity, like plasticene, lead, gold
You can change the surface of the object itself
density
There is a type of matter in a neutron star that will completely change the earth's surface and it is called strange matter that is so powerful that it will make the earth a blob of a mess, even water!
Destroying and improvising !
no
They don't change the earth. They change the area by destroying buildings, vegetation, ect.