You can show that two lines cut by a transversal are parallel in a number of ways.
(1) Show that the consecutive interior angles are supplementary. Let's say your lines are arranged like this (ignore the periods, they're just there so the spacing is right):
......................1 | 2
--------------------|-----------------------
.......................8| 3
.........................|
......................7 | 4
--------------------|-----------------------
......................6 | 5
If the lines are parallel, the measures of all the consecutive interior angles should be supplementary. The following should be true:
Angle 8 + Angle 3 = 180 degrees
Angle 3 + Angle 4 = 180 degrees
Angle 4 + Angle 7 = 180 degrees
and
Angle 7 + Angle 8 = 180 degrees
(2) You can also prove that the lines are parallel by showing that the corresponding angles are congruent. Using the line arrangement above, prove any of the following to be true:
Angle 1 = Angle 7
Angle 2 = Angle 4
Angle 3 = Angle 5
or
Angle 8 = Angle 6
(3) Finally, you can use alternate angles (either interior or exterior).
To use alternate interior angles, prove that:
Angle 3 = Angle 7
or
Angle 4 = Angle 8
To use alternate exterior angles, prove that:
Angle 1 = Angle 5
or
Angle 2 = Angle 6
Well, there you have it! Best of luck!
أيا" كان This is what is corresponding to "whatever" in Arabic, & it's written as "Ayyan kaan" but the two small short parallel lines must be written like this // but I couldn't write them better way.
A logical sequence in an argument is a way to prove a step has a logical consequence. Every proposition in an argument must be tested in this fashion to prove that every action has a reaction.
A sestet is the name given to the second division of a Sonnet which must consist of an octave, of eight lines, succeeded by a sestet, of six lines.
A non polygon is a shape that doesn't meet the requierments to be a polygon. In order to be a polygon, a shape must have no curved lines and must be a closed shape.
Your spurious accusation won't hold water.
The importance is that parallel lines must never meet.
The question is baffling. They're not different. Perpendicular lines must be intersecting lines.The only lines that are not intersecting lines are parallel lines. If two lines arenot parallel, then they must intersect, and they can be perpendicular or not.
Parallel Lines - Skew lines are lines that do not intersect and do not lie in the same plane. If two lines lie in the same plane they they must either intersect or they are parallel.
yes they can be parallel because for a pair of lines to be parallel the slope must be the same no matter if the slope is positive or negative.
I don't exactly understand what you are trying to say in this question. However, one thing I can tell you about the slope of parallel lines is that they are equal. Parallel lines must have the same slope.
If lines neither intersect nor are parallel, then they must be drawn in 3D space, or a higher dimension.(These lines are called skew lines)
If the two lines lie in the same plane, and they do not intersect, then they are parallel. If they are not in the same plane, and do not intersect, then they are called skew lines.
A trapezoid has only one pair of parallel lines so it cannot be a parallelogram which must have two pairs of parallel lines.
Yes, they do. By definition, lines that never intersect must be parallel, so all non-parallel lines must intersect at some point. Given that they are normal lines (y=mx+b) they will always have a point that suffices the equation when they are set equal to each other.
They are skew lines. Two parallel lines must be in the same plane.
In 2-dimensional space they must be parallel. In 3-d space they be parallel or skew lines I believe.
Two parallel lines never meet or intersect. Two lines that aren't parallel must have one point somewhere where they intersect.