he was accused of treason, which of course was not true, but the French wanted him dead because of the autrocities his ancestors committed.
Treason.
Accused can be used as a verb and an adjective. Verb: That man has been accused of many heinous crimes. Adjective: He is an accused killer.
the mob demanded that charles darnay be released
2 reasons are: his father and uncle committed terrible crimes and he was condemned because of their crimes. He was an aristocrat and during the French Revolution all aristocrats were condemned unfairly just for being an aristocrat.
Darnay
Defarge stated that Darnay was Evremonde.
John Barsad accused Charles Darnay of treason in A Tale of Two Cities. He was a spy and witness for the prosecution during Darnay's trial.
he was accused of treason, which of course was not true, but the French wanted him dead because of the autrocities his ancestors committed.
No, Charles Darnay was wrongly accused of treason in "A Tale of Two Cities." He was acquitted due to lack of evidence and a last-minute testimony that proved his innocence.
The brothers who need the doctor's services in "A Tale of Two Cities" are Charles Darnay and Sydney Carton. Charles Darnay is unjustly accused of treason and faces the death penalty, while Sydney Carton devises a plan to switch places with him to save his life.
Charles Darnay is the Marquis' nephew.
The most prominent reason seems to come from his French nationality. Additional reasons are vague and not clearly presented to the reader.
The lawyer who defended Charles Darnay in the Tale of Two Cities was Sydney Carton. Carton ultimately sacrifices himself in place of Darnay at the end of the trial.
Charles Darnay is a fictional character in the book A Tale of Two Cities.
Charles Darnay was a gentleman.
he apologized for being rude to Charles Darnay and asked for his forgiveness
The Marquis of Evremonde was known as Charles Darnay in England.
Charles Darnay's statement that he knew the Marquis was an example of verbal irony because, although he did in fact know the Marquis personally, he was implying that he knew him in a positive or friendly manner when, in reality, his relationship with the Marquis was anything but positive. This contrast between what is said and what is meant creates verbal irony.