If you are relying on someone as a source of information, you should know what qualifications that person has, to write authoritatively on that topic.
What information should you know about the authors of your sources?
To determine if the information being reported is fair and reliable one would have to check the reliability of the sources. This can be done by contacting the sources directly, and/or further investigation.
Yes, because you still got the information from a website, you didn't know it in your mind.
It is very important to know the author of the material you are reading to ensure its credibility. An author who is an expert on the field that he is writing about is more reliable than someone who is just considered a secondhand source. Also, when you base your materials to credible authors, you are confident of getting the right information that you need.
well i think ... that 1 basic information is its global economy and how it gained money... hahahaha i really dont know hahahahahaha
Primary Sources are created by people who actually experienced the event.
You should know the authors of your sources to assess their credibility, expertise, and potential bias. Understanding the author's qualifications and background can help you determine the reliability and validity of the information presented. This is important as it allows you to make informed decisions about the accuracy and trustworthiness of the source before using it in your own work.
I, II, and III I. information your reader will need to know about your topic II. information that might prove the validity of an argument or position III. information that might disprove the validity of an argument or position
In order for me to answer your question I would need to know what was listed as sources of information to let you know which sources were the credible sources. You can resubmit your question with the sources. Thanks for using answers com and wikianswers com.
I have access to a wide range of sources and databases which contain information about the Incas, including their history, culture, and achievements. My knowledge is based on these sources and I can provide you with detailed information if needed.
Like many unknown sources, academic wiki is a compilation of information from unknown 3rd party sources. Since we don't know the source directly, the information should be taken with a grain of salt aka be weary. Nonetheless, the site still offers great advice.
To determine if the information being reported is fair and reliable one would have to check the reliability of the sources. This can be done by contacting the sources directly, and/or further investigation.
Because sometimes if someone doesn't know something and they just want to answer a question they write something random. -random person I'd say because they don't know how to use the internet. Check the sources of the information provided by wiki. If your in college I assume that they taught you something about researching information, so you should know how to check sources.
Terry Pratchett wrote "Hogfather". If you want to know more important information about "Hogfather", then you should check out the online website, IMDb.
Yes, it is important for newspaper reporters to have transparency and credibility by citing their sources. This allows readers to verify the information and ensures accuracy in reporting. Additionally, showing sources helps in maintaining journalistic integrity.
the four types of sources are books, internet, library,files I know there is general, primary and secondary, Not sure about the last.
Secondary sources of information include books, journal articles, newspapers, magazines, and websites that interpret, analyze, or comment on primary sources. For example, a textbook discussing the historical events of World War II would be considered a secondary source of information.
Yes, because you still got the information from a website, you didn't know it in your mind.