Chattel is something that belongs to you, or your property. Historically, chattel was often used to refer to slaves, although it now means any personal possessions.
CHAT-tel
Property that is not real (land) property.
Chattle
Chattel slavery is a type of slavery where the slave is considered the personal property of the master and has no rights or autonomy. In this system, slaves are treated as commodities that can be bought, sold, or traded at the owner's discretion.
Very low to entice borrowing so that when the currency printers contract the supply of THEIR fiat currency, everyone will get squeezed and they can pick up cheap labour, cheap property, cheap chattle etc. Then we start it all over again. It keeps them from getting bored.
Landowners in Chesapeake colonies began using chattel slavery primarily for economic reasons. Enslaved labor was seen as a more efficient and cost-effective way to produce labor-intensive crops like tobacco. Additionally, the racial hierarchy that developed in the colonies supported the idea of using enslaved Africans as a permanent underclass for labor.
Chattel slavery was a system in which individuals were treated as personal property that could be bought, sold, and owned indefinitely. This practice was prevalent in the Americas, particularly in the 17th to 19th centuries, where enslaved Africans were forcibly taken from their homeland and subjected to brutal conditions on plantations and in households. Chattel slavery dehumanized individuals, stripping them of their rights and autonomy, and it had lasting social, economic, and cultural impacts that persist today.
During the Elizabethan era, Eve and women in general were traditionally viewed as weak, witless, and sinful for obeying Satan and eating the apple from the Tree of Knowledge. Full blame was cast upon Eve and consequentially, women suffered from this common perspective. Still apart from being responsible for children and the household, women also worked. Women of the upper classes enjoyed life and intrigued at court like the men. Women of the middle classes often helped in the business and took care of the household at the same time. Some were landladies or shopkeepers. Women in cities of the lower classes, would often provide labor for the guilds (as seamstresses, tanners, weavers etc) or be midwives or market-women or prostitutes. Women at farms worked at the land like the men, but were also responsible for spinning, weaving, making clothes, taking care of small animals, the house and children.
1. 'Cause it would be harder for them to steal/"mis-appropriate as much if people knew how much there was to begin with. It's none of your business, if you ask any more questions like this, we'll use the "pay try it" act to declare you a terrorist and render you off to the goolag, never to be seen again, here in the land of the free, and the home of the slave. All in the name of national security, of course... We're so free, we have more PERSONS in prison than any other country on earth... The cost ofa Harvard education wasted on every one. 2. Persons (We are people) PERSONS are chattle owned by the corporate govenment, and they don't deserve to know -just pay.It is not a coincidence our birth certificates are storedat the department ofcomerce. It's not like they had extra room in the basement or something.... It's like they own us, and everything wepossess. Your car - a certificate of title is a certificate there is a title somewhere. theonly thing you can be sure of is you ain't got it!Pink slip - get real - that's what womenwear under a dress! Same thing with your home - Warrenty deed - A warrenty there is a deed somewhere...theonly thing you can be sure of is you ain't got it! PERSONShave only civil rights - what Ceasor (sp) gives Ceasor can take anytime he wants, People have unailenable rights from God that came before government, that governments were instituted among men to protect, according to the founding documents of america, that are but a joke now... If you think you can handle the sad truth, it can be found here... It's not my work... this guy looked into all this and more. And he is good. http://www.geocities.com/tthor.geo/mywork.html
They were cheap labor, easy to control and industrialists were primarily immoral and greedy. The Children could also fit into spaces that many adults could not . Children made more income for the family . Some just work so they can afford food !!
I think that the words "too much freedom" really should not be put together in that order. I believe the real question is "Are parents skilled enough for todays youth?" That answer is, for the most part, a big collective NO. They do not modernize as necessary to support a shift in culture. Childhood freedom is the best part of living in the here and now. No more patriarchial (What dad say goes!) crap of the 50's. Children are now unhindered by parents who have major insecurity issues. Children are able to point out their parents mistake (Which I fell is a grand thing. For, if I'm screwing up I want one of my three children to let me know. I sure as hell would have wanted the same when I was growing up!) However, the freedom means parents need to get their buts in gear and either network with parents who know what their doing or read up on books (Not the ones that say "YOU ARE THE PARENT!". Those titles are destructive to otherwise constructive parenting. Freedom is a good thing for youth to have. They can make healthier choices (having learned the hard way will instill in them their lesson quicker than ludicrous rules and regulations).So, in short, I believe that the amount of freedom some kids have is far to less for a growing mind and spirit (not the religious kind of spirit). Just because they have not turned 18 does not mean they couldn't be fully autonomous if given the chance. That is a good skill to have. Give them the love you can give them, listen, be there, help (WHEN THEY ASK FOR IT) but you want them to be able to 'make it' without you. Just in case something would ever happen to you.Parenting!Having raised six children - and all of them now parents themselves and less then seventy miles away - I would disagree with the previous answer. The dilemma of the 1960's, really a revolt against too much parental control, resulted, like any other revolt, in overcompensation and allowing too much freedom. Like Aristotle proposed nearly 2500 years ago, we need to find the "Golden Mean." At time we need to exercise control and, at other times, we need to let go.So now, when do we control and when do we let go? Yes, of course, this is more difficult than to take the simpler, one course route. This is where your judgment as parent comes into play. And, that judgment has to do with the child and its maturity.I just answered a query as to whether a 10-13 year old child should be allowed to go to the shopping mall alone. Most likely not, but this depends on the child. How well can the child make a good decision? This is the ultimate question! As parents you must ask your child specific questions! Would you go with a stranger who wants to buy you an ice cream? Would you join your friends when they decide to go into a store and steal merchandise?Parenting is a full-time job. There are no easy answers. Each situation must be judged independently and be based on the maturity of the child and their ability to make good decisions. Some children mature earlier than others. But most want some direction.
Conchita Campbell has: Played Young April in "Cold Squad" in 1998. Played Lexy Morse in "Wilder Days" in 2003. Played Maia Skouris in "The 4400" in 2004. Played Maia Rutledge Skouris in "The 4400" in 2004. Played Alison Keats in "Pursued" in 2004. Played Maia Rutledge in "The 4400" in 2004. Played Basketball Girl in "Bob the Butler" in 2005. Played Freeda in "Zixx: Level Two" in 2005. Played Maggie Thompson in "Supernatural" in 2005. Played Rachel in "Scary Movie 4" in 2006. Played Kennedy in "Bates Motel" in 2013. Played Mandy Morris in "Sitting on the Edge of Marlene" in 2014.